Does a great trainer depend on the skill of the fighter he trains or does he elevate their skill. Does the fighter make the trainer, or does the trainer make the fighter? Kevin Kelley, the popular former WBC featherweight titleholder who won 41 straight fights between 1988 and 94, told RingTV.com theres no question the fighter makes the trainer. The fighter makes the trainer all day long," he said. "Without the fighter, the trainer has nobody. Without the fighter, who is the trainer? If it was true that the trainer made the fighter, why is it that after a trainer gets one champion or two champions or three champions, he cant produce any more champions? Long-time manager Cameron Dunkin agrees, but with a caveat. The fighter makes the trainer and God makes the fighter, in my opinion," he said. "And you can see that by how many fighters win titles with fathers and guys who have never trained a pro fighter before and the kid goes off and wins a world title. But the difference is if you can get that fighter with a good trainer, what a huge difference it makes. (Top Rank matchmaker) Bruce Trampler used to say this to me all the time, and gosh was he 100 percent right about this. He said a great trainer will make your fighter five to 10 percent better, and a bad trainer will make your fighter 100 percent worse. A bad trainer can ruin a guy who was going to be a champion anyway. But a guy whos going to be a champion anyway can be five or 10 percent better, and thats a big difference. http://www.ringtv.com/blog/2623/great_fighters_make_great_trainers_not_the_other_way_around/ I think it is probably 50/50 between both the fighter and the trainer
both are right, if a fighter with much natural ability like ali or jones jr they didnt really need a trainer, but other guys like lewis,pacquiao,wlad klitschko their trainers have helped them develop in who they became.
Great trainers can do alot for a fighters technique wise and etc, but the trainer needs the right person to excerise the craft in the ring. Manny would be manny with or without Roach, but Roach teachs him the tools he needs to win fights.
agree but if jones jr. had better fundamentals rather than rely on his athletism and talent perhaps he would still be a force at 175 or cruiser.
So where does this leave Mike Tyson? Seems like he declined as soon as he lost his good trainers. It must be said that the trainers also kept him focused. This is an interesting question because I felt the Maidana/Khan fight was exactly this -- a tutored fighter against a natural fighter. Did you hear anything about how good Maidana's trainer was? Of course not, but we know that Roach had a game plan that Amir had to follow. Even though Amir showed some courage, he might have really been in trouble without any game plan. In the case of Sugar Ray Leonard and Ali, it would seem that Angelo Dundee is best known for his words of encouragement. I always think of it in terms of a quarterback is only as good as his offensive line and catching receivers. A fighter can have a raw natural ability but if he goes against another elite fighter, the trainer becomes that good offensive line.
I don't think Manny would be this good if he didn't meet Roach. Just my opinion. I think it's a combination of both, talent will always be better with good guidance. While the greatest coach will not be able to turn someone without the talent into a great fighter.
“Romero was a world champion but you know what I know: After every fight, his face looked like someone beat him with a baseball bat," Dunkin said. "He blew everybody out early because I picked all the easy opponents, but once he reached the top level, if he didn’t knock guys out early, then over the rounds he’d just keep getting pounded and pounded. “And he retired at like 26 years of age totally shot. How much better could he have been? He had so much ability I wonder how far he’d have gone if he had a Kenny Adams or Nacho Beristain or Jesus Rivero.” The point: Some guys have so much natural ability they’re going to be champions no matter who trains them, but the right trainer can make them more than champions. Cameron cited the career of former world middleweight champion Kelly Pavlik, who has been trained throughout his career by Jack Loew. “I always wanted Kelly with (Kenny) Adams because I think he would have been great,” Dunkin said. “Yes, Pavlik won the title. But those hard fights with (Jermain) Taylor and (Edison) Miranda, he gutted them out. But how good could he have been if he could have stepped to the side, used angles, moved his head, all those things Kenny teaches? My God, he could have been special. That’s what makes me sick.”
I agree... Pavlik is a guy whose limited trainer has really hurt his development as a fighter as he's stepped up in class. When he was beating stiffs and journeyman while he was coming up it didn't show... but when he was in with the likes of Hopkins, Martinez and even Taylor...guys who could box and move, Pavlik's trainer failed him miserably...not just throughout the fight with his pathetic instruction, but with preparing Kelly for the fight. I believe it depends on the fighter of course, but I think having the right trainer can either make or break a fighter's career.