Who performs better at welterweight?

I think Khan, only because hes naturally bigger and not because hes better than the others......cause hes not.

 

I think Khan does the worst. Too many punchers at 147.

 

I'll agree with the "Khan because of larger natural size" angle.

 

Who knows. They are all on the small side except for Khan, but his chin... Interesting, but I see Bradley jumping up to test the waters first.

 

Alexander actually had his first few fights as a welterweight.

Khan has the size to make him good at WW. He's fast so the added weight wouldn't slow him down too much. He doesn't hit that hard, and he has a **** chin though. A welterweight without tons of power is Mayweather, but his chin isn't **** and he has great defense to cover his AZZ.

Bradley is the smallest, and he doesn't hit so hard.

I went with Devon. Guys who moved up to 147 were successful there, he started off at 147, so who's to say he can't do it at 147?

 

My guess goes to Devon... he is the most ripped of them all so making 147 would not make his body too soft.

 

Devon Alexander. Bradley is too small and Khan has a Glass Jaw.

 

Well, with that added weight Khan could train his legs and neck a lot more, helping his chin out. It's allllll relative.

All three of them are in pretty damned impressive physical shape. It's kinda hard to say "most ripped" when they're obviously all in a similar peak condition.

 

Devon is also the more natural athlete, slim muscled, so the extra weight wouldn't slow him down to much

 

Devon is also the only one there without any delusions of fighting $ or pac.