Who punched harder at 160? Nigel Benn or Julian Jackson?

Amen to that my brother

 

Jackson was the P4P hardest puncher I've ever seen, Benn was a big puncher as well and I think he'd flatten Jackson if they had ever fought but he wasn't quite the destroyer JJ was.

 

Don't let these racist infidel *******s grind you down Boxed, you're a figure of legend. Go away, look at a picture of Martin Luther King for 12 seconds and listen to five hours of Labi Siffre music in a flotation tank. If this doesn't help I apologise.

 

This isn't particularly close, Jackson. Benn's power gets overrated these days if we're comparing him with Jackson

 

Proof is in the pudding

Jackson pure one punch lights out kayoes over herol graham..terry norris..rocked mccallum bad..jackson didnt have particularly fast hands...slow feet..but had a craftsmans precision in his counters and one punch was all it took...

Benn was the opposite of studied precision,a wild fast fisted swinging puncher with tremendous power and very effective fastfootwork..but his best kayoes were more slashing bashing or wear down multi punch ones ...barkley,dewitt,McClellan.

I go with jackson

Both though were tremendous powerpunchers at 160

 

Jackson was a 10 power wise but averagely paced with it if it hit you.. Goodnight Vienna .. Benn was a 9 but the punches came thick and fast and were probably more painful as they didn't put you out cold so you felt them more .. Just an accumulated collection of violent evil intentioned leather flying at you.

 

At 160 it is close.maybe benn by a bit..
Pfp jackson is the king.. Foreman,shavers ,tua,tyson,morrrison,baer,liston etc all them are nothing compared with Julian in the hiting power department pfp

 

Guy you are drunk or drugged

 

Yes it was just dumb