Who put on the better masterclass? Calzaghe vs Lacy or Hopkins vs Pavlik?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by KingCobra, Aug 3, 2009.


  1. 1lehudson

    1lehudson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,789
    2
    Jul 27, 2004
    Well you havent watched many fights then....
     
  2. PrideOfWales

    PrideOfWales Winston Zedmore Full Member

    11,684
    1
    Apr 20, 2006
    You could say that Calzaghe taught Hopkins that more activity wins you fights. Calzaghe gave Hopkins a new lease of life... Like Hopkins said, he's always learning. I think he learned a lot from Calzaghe.
     
  3. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    Epic Fail!
     
  4. PrideOfWales

    PrideOfWales Winston Zedmore Full Member

    11,684
    1
    Apr 20, 2006
    How come?

    You think the Hopkins that turned up against Calzaghe puts on the same show against Pavlik?
     
  5. southpaw jab

    southpaw jab Guest

    Bernard Hopkins' victory over Kelly Pavlik was much more impressive than Joe Calzaghe's victory over Jeff Lacy. Hopkins was much older than Calzaghe and Pavlik was a much better and more accomplished fighter than Jeff Lacy. Pavlik is the undisputed middleweight champ, while Jeff Lacy carried a meaningless alphabet (IBF) strap.
     
  6. Jude

    Jude Just Journeying Man Full Member

    1,394
    2
    Nov 4, 2007
    IMO. It was the same Hopkins, its just Calzaghe and Pavlik are on different dimensions.
     
  7. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    I kind of get what you're saying. I'll take my "Epic Fail" statement back.
     
  8. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,142
    Jun 23, 2005
    Calzaghe put on a master class as well but I give Hopkins more credit because he fought and schooled the better fighter. Lacy was nothing more than a limited slugger.
     
  9. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,142
    Jun 23, 2005
    You must have just started watching boxing a few years ago.
     
  10. PrideOfWales

    PrideOfWales Winston Zedmore Full Member

    11,684
    1
    Apr 20, 2006
    And Pavlik is a one paced, plodding, predictable, upright repetitive boxer that doesn't move his head and is easy to hit.

    Hopkins/Pavlik went EXACTLY as I thought it would because Hopkins is that good and Pavlik simply isn't anywhere near his level.

    Although to be fair, I also predicted that Pavlik would visit the canvas in the fight but that didn't happen.
     
  11. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,142
    Jun 23, 2005
    Pavlik is light years more skilled than Lacy who was nothing more than a crude slugger with a chissled physique and a catchy nickname Pavlik's jab alone and his ability to mount a real offensive attack proves that.:deal
     
  12. PrideOfWales

    PrideOfWales Winston Zedmore Full Member

    11,684
    1
    Apr 20, 2006
    Though Pavlik is the better boxer, light years is a discrediting boxers with actual skills.
     
  13. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    Both were masterclasses but Calzaghe-Lacy was more of a beatdown so I go with that one, Lacy has a heart as big as everest but I think that beating ruined him, Pavlik still looks ok.
     
  14. KCD

    KCD All aboard. Full Member

    8,219
    2
    Sep 30, 2007