Who ranks higher all-time: John Ruiz or Vitali Klitschko?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Thread Stealer, Sep 10, 2007.


  1. MacManJr.

    MacManJr. Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,111
    6
    Jul 11, 2007
    Gotta go with Huggy Bear I mean Ruiz.
     
  2. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,038
    Jun 30, 2005
    Jones, Toney, Tua, and Valuev are a step below Lewis and Byrd (both of whom Vitali was at least ahead against before retiring on injuries).

    Ruiz may have the better legacy, but his losses are worse than Vitali's.
     
  3. Jose FM

    Jose FM Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,612
    1
    Apr 29, 2007
    I dunno, maybe Vitali based on what could have been, and we all know what Ruiz was, and it wasnt anything close to Vitali.
     
  4. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,444
    Jun 30, 2005
    You rate fighters on what they did, not what they "could have been".

    You can say lots of guys "could have been" something special.
     
  5. TheGreat

    TheGreat Boxing Junkie banned

    13,028
    14
    Jan 12, 2005
    Ruiz going away as he actually fought good competition and is a 2 time WBA champ who defended his title many times, Vitaly on the other hand is all hype with no substance, the highlight of his career was getting beat up by a shot LL.
     
  6. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,869
    3,120
    Apr 16, 2005
    It's not even CLOSE. Unlike Ruiz, Vitali fought WITHIN the rules, and didn't use illegal and disreputable tactics like excessive holding or faking low blows. :-(

    Ruiz is, and always has been, nothing more than a talentless clubfighter who would have been lucky to win a regional title without the influence of Don King. He is a fraud, and a disgrace to the sport, and most boxing fans know it!:yep
     
  7. Jose FM

    Jose FM Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,612
    1
    Apr 29, 2007
    Yeah but Ruiz only has one quality win and a draw agianst Holy, and lost to everyone important including former middleweight Jones. While Both of Vitali's losses were questionable. Plus Vitali can still come back and win a title.
     
  8. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,444
    Jun 30, 2005
    There is nothing questionable about a guy quitting because of an injury, or losing because his eye is badly cut.

    A questionable loss would be Ruiz to Holyfield and Valuev, or Quartey to De La Hoya, or De La Hoya to Trinidad, or Shavers to Ali, etc....

    Part of being a fighter is being durable and having the body/skin to take the rigors of fighting.

    Furthermore, Ruiz probably has more wins over guys who were heavyweight contenders at the time than Vitali does.
     
  9. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    I don't want to hear that Vitali retired due to injuries twice. That's skating over the truth.

    You will not find another fighter whose fans say he retired due to injuries when the other fighter cut his face into ribbons with a punch. That's called a TKO. I don't care if he was ahead on the scorecards. He got stopped by something caused by a punch.

    Ruiz fought and beat better opposition. But he lost more than Vitali as well. So they are about even. Vitali also had a Ring title.
     
  10. Jose FM

    Jose FM Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,612
    1
    Apr 29, 2007
    Dood had a separated shoulder in one fight which he was clearly in charge, and in the other he was ahead of the scorecards and was stopped, and we all saw what happened when it was stopped, Vitali was very upset and demanded a rematch and Lewis Never gave it to him, a true champ honors a re-match specially when he behind on scorecards. Barrera did it against Juarez, Louis did it against Walcott, and Lewis took the ***** road and retired! That in itself says something about Vitali. He didnt want it to be stopped he wanted to go on, but they didnt let him.
     
  11. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,444
    Jun 30, 2005
    Vitali doing well before losing is irrevelant. Big deal if he was ahead. What matters is winning and who you beat, not being ahead on points but losing because you can no longer continue.

    Coming from behind to win is better than being ahead, but losing.

    And there were plenty of guys more deserving of rematches than Vitali that never got one. Bad luck for Vitali, although he had the chance to establish himself from the rest of the HW pack. But injuries shortened his career, which makes this a viable comparison.
     
  12. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    BS on the true champ honors a rematch crap. It would be different if he fought someone instead of Vitali. He retired.
     
  13. kaygb

    kaygb Member Full Member

    488
    0
    Jul 20, 2004
    Ruiz. Just stop and think. What was Vitalis best win? "The Fat Man" Kirk Johnson? Hoffman? Comparing the resume of Ruiz and Vitali, Ruiz comes out on top. And to top it off, Vitalis best showing was a loss. I can hear it now in 20 years. "Man that Vitali was a great one. Did you see that loss to Lewis?"
    Yep, Ruiz comes out on top.
     
  14. precision

    precision New Member Full Member

    44
    0
    Jun 11, 2007
  15. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    I'd go with Vitali by a hair...he was the Ring champion and lost only twice. You can very well make a case for Ruiz. Head to head, Vitali is well above Ruiz.