Who ranks higher all time?Whitaker,Jones or Mayweather?

Oscar was drained hard against Pac.

Oscar hadn't looked great in years when he met Floyd.

 

You seem like a hater... I don't like Floyd as a person at all, but he is a special fighter and a true great.. When you start tossing the word fraud around is where you lose me.

 

Oscar came to fight against Floyd and looked to be the bigger man.

 

He is a fraud. He has exceptional skills and talent, but he isn't as great as you think he is.

 

He's been on the P4P list since 1998, and is a 5 weight champion. He's no fraud.

 

Wow...

 

#48 beat a shell of Erik Morales yet you think #48 is the second coming.:deal

 

I agree it was underrated especially since he fought Oscar with a stacked deck for his first fight ever at 154.

 

All of this and you picked #48 to beat PBF people like you can't be taken serious for boxing debate.:deal Also Chico fought at 130 for years later after PBF destroyed him there he even won a title there. PBF beats any version of Chico you knows this but hate to give credit where it's due because PBF has proven you wrong so many times. Weight wasn't a factor in that fight skills were.:deal

 

I've never given Manny credit for beating Morales. Erik was finished, done. When he had some gas in the tank he beat Pacquiao fair and square.

I've never given Manny credit for beating a washed up Morales.

That's putting words in my mouth. I'm not a fanboy or hater.

I'm spitting facts. Floyd hasn't beaten a great fighter at their best ever. And Pacquiao has done it twice.

Jones did it twice too.

Floyd hasn't. Again, Floyd's best wins are over good fighters, not great ones. There is a difference.

 

Chico is a good name to have on your resume. But for an ATG fighter you should gave something better than Chico and Castillo and Hatton.

 

Mayweather fans will just spit off that 25 world champion no wane like those champs were killers

 

The difference between all 3 fighters is longevity and record. All 3 were superb in their prime. Each won many one sided fights for many years. It really depends on who you liked more in their prime, but when it comes to who was greater, no question Floyd is the greater of the 3. He hasn't lost.

 

Floyd's will to win, ring IQ, and defense are truly TRULY underestimated by his critics.

 

This was a great conversation back in 2009-10. But not very much now with all the recent scalps and titles so late in his career. Mayweather just has the vastly superior resume to both of them.