Who Ranks Higher At 168? Froch Or Calzaghe?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by walk with me, Sep 23, 2013.


  1. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    Love both guys but wondering who everyone think ranks higher..... I personally give the nod to Froch. I also think Froch has the style to beat calzaghe but its clearly up for debate...

    vote or die!!!!!!!!!!1
     
  2. bandido

    bandido The Black Bandit Full Member

    6,638
    2
    Feb 25, 2010
    Calzaghe, he is the GOAT at 168
     
  3. lefthandlead

    lefthandlead Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,984
    878
    Jan 1, 2010
    I couldn't disagreed with you more.

    Head to head Joe makes Carl look foolish.
    117-111 type
    Carl is tough as hell, but his boxing skills are overrated, just because he outboxed AA.

    Joe is no Bute , say what you want about his "slaps", he has elite boxing skills. Cal's face would be busted up.
     
  4. lefthandlead

    lefthandlead Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,984
    878
    Jan 1, 2010
    This
     
  5. shanahan14

    shanahan14 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,488
    731
    Jul 5, 2011
    Are you asking head to head or legacy? I think the answer is the same, but the poll is misleading then.

    Regardless, as someone said, Calzaghe is the GOAT at 168. Deal with it.
     
  6. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    Calz will win this vote.
    (But Froch is knocking at his door.)

    I wonder what my over sea's friends think about this??
     
  7. walk with me

    walk with me Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,066
    47
    Nov 17, 2007
    I feel like if anything frochs boxing skills are under rated. He has a terrific jab, a difficult rhythm to gauge, he faints really well, and has good footwork.

    I have nothing to say about "calz" slaps... he's got great adaptability inside of the ring. Good head movement and a good jab as well. I'm just not sure if he would be able to keep froch off him. Calz is super accurate but Froch was dying to fight Joe for years (kind of like tarver & RJJ), Froch vs Joe might be one of those super fights were froch turns into a machine and won't be denied... Could be wrong tho



    damn shame we never got to see it.
     
  8. I'm not impressed by Calzaghes blown up record. He would have lost to both Froch and Ward.
     
  9. RoughD

    RoughD Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,687
    99
    Jun 29, 2006
    Ha shut up u sweaty sock
    Calz would of boxed both of their heads off. Calz chin was also on par with frochs!
     
  10. knocked down by old men rjj and hopkins in the very first round

    Froch by savage KO
     
  11. Mr Pibb

    Mr Pibb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,529
    19
    Jul 24, 2013
    Froch

    Crossed the pond and fought the best in their prime.:deal

    Better fighter....cagey and deciptive....KO power from both sides...tough as nails.

    More impressive wins.

    Froch gets legit KO's...he didn't need the ref to dive in and stop the fight for no reason.
     
  12. Mr Pibb

    Mr Pibb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,529
    19
    Jul 24, 2013
    :yep

    Froch would do The Welsh Rabbit worse than he did Lucian Bute.

    Imagine what Froch would do to a shot Charles Brewer or Tokker Pudwell.

    He'd be in prison.
     
  13. Mr Pibb

    Mr Pibb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,529
    19
    Jul 24, 2013
    Nothing Joe had was on par with Froch.

    Especially POWER.
     
  14. :lol:
     
  15. Richel Hersisia

    Richel Hersisia Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,544
    2
    Jan 31, 2005
    Calzaghe was by far the superior fighter. However, if you base your rankings on resume alone, Froch could be ahead