Who ranks higher on the ATG list in Toney and Holyfield?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Wass1985, Sep 29, 2015.


  1. uncletermite

    uncletermite Boxing Addict banned

    4,436
    44
    Aug 2, 2015
    well your title is wrong then isn't it?and even p4p I showed Holy to be better and no one still agrees with you. :thumbsup
     
  2. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010
  3. uncletermite

    uncletermite Boxing Addict banned

    4,436
    44
    Aug 2, 2015
    If I could post anything in the smiles it would read" THIS THREAD SUX" ,but unfortunately they don't have that one! :lol:
     
  4. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    You belong in the window licker section, unfortunately there would only be one member.... You.
     
  5. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    My title is fine dumbass, I don't think I'd listen to a cretin like you to decide which fighter is better...
     
  6. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,810
    4,560
    Jul 14, 2009
    Thread has become classeless for the Classic Forum.

    In my opinion, Holy ranks as a TOP 25 ATG. Toney is more in the range of a TOP 50 - TOP 80 ATG.

    Both are great warriors with great resume.
     
  7. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Holyfield beat who he needed to beat, Toney simply didn't.
     
  8. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,846
    6,625
    Dec 10, 2014
    I'd say Holfield

    He was much more consistent over his career.

    Toney underachieved based on his talent level.
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,661
    27,376
    Feb 15, 2006
    It actually says:

    "Both legends of the sport, who ranks higher on the P4P ATG list in these two?"

    Are you trying to make yourself look like a fool here?
     
  10. uncletermite

    uncletermite Boxing Addict banned

    4,436
    44
    Aug 2, 2015


    that's impossible you are here aren't you? :patsch
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,661
    27,376
    Feb 15, 2006
    At least I can read what the original post says.

    Apparently you can't after being repeatedly prompted to look at it!
     
  12. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,579
    1,919
    Sep 9, 2011
    on average the guy's made 27 posts a day for 2 months(probably more, that's assuming a 1st aug start date), how could he possibly have time to read ops, watch fights or learn facts?
     
  13. uncletermite

    uncletermite Boxing Addict banned

    4,436
    44
    Aug 2, 2015
    I don't have to look at anything the title says otherwise,being its a wass thread it wouldn't have mattered regardless he is the only imbecile in agreement with himself on this thread an you are the only imbecile still posting numerous posts about the actual topic ,I think ones enough! :dead
     
  14. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    What's up having to skip threads because I well and truely destroyed you on the Vitali vs Frazier thread?? :lol::lol:
     
  15. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,661
    27,376
    Feb 15, 2006
    You are saying that you don't need to read the original post, because you can see what it says from the title?

    I guess you obviously can't!