Who ranks higher on your ATG List. Oscar De La Hoya or Floyd Mayweather Jr

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Skittlez, Oct 10, 2012.


  1. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,571
    3,763
    May 4, 2012
    Mediocre means not very good. Toney, Trinidad, etc. had mediocre footwork. Oscar has good footwork, short of excellent.
     
  2. HawkFan16

    HawkFan16 Unshot/In My Prime Full Member

    3,511
    3
    Jun 16, 2008
    It's funny when you try and act like an intelligent unbiased boxing fan. You even made a thread arguing that Floyd is the GOAT. That kinda destroys your credibility off the bat, because there are dozens of boxers with better resumes, H2H ability, or sometimes even both.

    Floyd has a strong case for being the H2H GOAT at 130, but nowhere else. Oscar is better than he is H2H and resume wise at 140-154, and ranks higher on the ATG list. Oscar might be one of my favorite fighters, but I don't nuthug him the way you nuthug Floyd to the point where you can't even think logically.

    You're not a boxing fan, you're a Floyd fanboy. You probably won't even watch boxing after he retires, if you don't commit seppuku when he retires or loses that is.
     
  3. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    not very good and not very bad = medicore. Like i say if u are expecting a above medicore category then he will fall in there.
     
  4. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    I have said plenty of times that SRR is the GOAT. He got the boxing smarts and heavyhand/speed.

    Floyd is the GOAT in boxing ability. If Floyd and SRR is the same size i would not take SRR over FLoyd prime for prime.
     
  5. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,571
    3,763
    May 4, 2012
    :lol: :lol: Oh boy.
     
  6. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    Also Hawk. If Floyd really is some **** fighter who fought bums then why the whole boxing world is talking about him non stop. Everythings lead to his name.
     
  7. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    There is basically no way Floyd could do enough to be consider as the GOAT. SRR reign was long and consistent. He simply fought too many people and for the most part in impressive fashion to be dethrone.
     
  8. HawkFan16

    HawkFan16 Unshot/In My Prime Full Member

    3,511
    3
    Jun 16, 2008
    He's not even the best in terms of technical skills! Whitaker is more skilled than Floyd, and so is Duran. Guys like Napoles, Hearns, Benitez, Leonard, Hagler, and Robinson were all just as skilled, if not more so than Floyd. He's not the most skilled fighter of all time, not by a long shot. He's very skilled, perhaps one of the best, but the best? Nowhere close.

    Even if you just want to look at defensive skills, Whitaker, Pep, and Locche are all as good or better defensively. Moreover, a lot of Floyd's success is/was based on his far above average athleticism; that's starting to erode now, and he hasn't looked unbeatable in a long time because of that. If his skills were really that otherworldly, he'd still be tooling people like they were some scrubs and fighting more than once a year against carefully selected opposition. But he's not.

    His athleticism was important to his success, though not as much as his skills. But his skills just aren't as uber as you say they are, or else he wouldn't have visibly declined as much or managed his career as he has recently.
     
  9. tliang1000

    tliang1000 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,112
    7
    Aug 18, 2007
    Pep. Locche? Whitaker all fall short. Look u can believe what u want. I get on here to kill some time. I don't expect many knowledgable posters.

    You guys want to prove something email me winners in tennis and boxing. Dig up some live dogs for me to make money at. Otherwise i really don't take ur opinions seriously. i'm off work till next time. Talk is cheap put it in action.
     
  10. HawkFan16

    HawkFan16 Unshot/In My Prime Full Member

    3,511
    3
    Jun 16, 2008
    He ain't a **** fighter. I have never said anywhere that he is a **** fighter. He's a very good fighter who hasn't come close to maxing out his potential because he fights in a weak era and doesn't even have the mindset to fight everyone available to him and take challenges. He's insanely overrated by people like you though. He was very lucky to have got the win against Castillo the first time, has carefully picked opponents, damaged his legacy with a horse**** fake retirement, missed many worthy opponents, etc. He simply would not have been as successful during the 80s or 90s and is not some unstoppable H2H beast anywhere but possibly at 130 pounds.

    The boxing world talks about him because he's one of the two PPV stars left in the sport. Selling PPVs doesn't automatically make you the best ever though.
     
  11. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,036
    27,681
    Jul 26, 2004

    Vargas was p4p when he fought Trinidad, not when he fought Hoya. Vargas was 9 or 10th in the rings top 10 before the Trinidad fight, I dont believe Vargas ever placed again after his defeat.

    Or are you just listing p4p for people who have ever ranked in the top 10? :think

    In that case, Floyd deserves a lot more 'p4p's next to his opponent if one is trying to not be bias.

    Not trying to nitpick its just something I noticed.

    Also real quick how was Ortiz a challenger? He was the WBC champion when he defeated Berto, it was Mayweather who was challenging Ortiz.

    Cotto was a champion and was also a top 4 JMW (for right or wrong)

    Actually skimming over your list it looks like it is largely bias in favor of Hoya. :huh

    And Im not trying to pick your post apart so I hope you dont think Im trying to do that its just that imo it seems like youre being a bit bias here. just imo though and no offence ment.


    ----------------------------------------------

    As for the question, Im not sure.... close to call for me, leaning towards Oscar being higher.
     
  12. bjl12

    bjl12 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,849
    2,539
    Sep 26, 2012
    Floyd's resume is far superior to MP's resume.

    Manny's best wins are against fighters coming off recent or consecutive losses. He has a history of hurting people who've recently been beaten, and badly.

    Floyd's resume > Manny's hard.
     
  13. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    only if you're ******ed or a ***** :lol:
     
  14. Elite

    Elite Guest

    Looks like a new thread is going to be made in a short while.
     
  15. The Mangler

    The Mangler Active Member Full Member

    788
    0
    Aug 16, 2012
    May done better work than Goldie has. Goldie lost too many of his big fights to be ranked above May. His res is still good tho.