Who ranks higher P4P all time- Hopkins or Floyd?

Hopkins.

 

I think its very close. My biased opinion says Hopkins though.

 

I think its very close. My biased opinion says Hopkins though.

 

Mayweather. Although I do like Hopkins more.

 

I think they'll both be ranked as greats and you can argue over resumes.
But when looking back many people will say " He was probably the most talented fighter I ever saw" and it's more likely it'll be Floyd they'll be talking about.

 

Hopkins has the better resume and longevity, also Hopkins record defences equalize Floyd´s weight jumping. Clearly Hopkins.

 

Hopkins dominated his division for years and Floyd moved around weights to much cherry picking some average fighters to often. This is not even close. Hopkins by a mile.

 

hopkins resume is ****in crazy. he's also never really been beaten decisively.

 

Maywhether. his 130 resume. Beating Linear champ at 140 also.
No losses, and pretty dominant against nearly every fighter he fought.

The better boxer.

 

Hopkins.

 

What is "crazy" about his resume? It's fairly mediocre by ATG standards. His longevity is his only real stand-out point on paper. There are, of course, other factors to be taken into consideration when rating a fighter, but on paper I'd give Mayweather the edge. Overall, it's basically a toss-up, depending on what you prefer.

Also, Hopkins has most certainly been beaten decisively.

 

Truly. When looking at it objectively, Floyd's success at 130 alone is enough to at least match Hopkins's success at 160. Hopkins has the longevity at the weight, while Floyd's resume was better and he was likely even more dominant. When taking everything into account, I'd probably slightly favor Floyd, but I can see arguments for Hopkins depending on how highly you favor certain aspects over others.