Who ranks higher P4P - Crawford or Golovkin?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Jul 24, 2016.


  1. blackbolt396

    blackbolt396 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,146
    653
    Feb 13, 2012
    I concur.
     
  2. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,048
    24,027
    Feb 19, 2007
    ggg, if crawford can take out pac in his next fight, he leap frogs ggg till ggg can clear out 168... assuming crawford keeps winning.
     
  3. Lazar

    Lazar Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,114
    4,280
    Mar 3, 2016
    Not quite what you were expecting out of this poll, is it? Haha.
     
  4. IKSAB

    IKSAB Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    4,411
    1,180
    Nov 29, 2014
    Crawford and its not even up for debate. Better resume, more complete skillset, less beatable.
     
  5. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,048
    24,027
    Feb 19, 2007
    yeah, cause knocking out anyone brave enough to face you makes you oh so beatable.:good
     
  6. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Rums, IK...do you smell **** in here?:lol:
     
  7. thesmokingm

    thesmokingm Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,033
    4,323
    Nov 18, 2009
    It will be hard for Bud to shake the run my ass off image.
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,361
    21,807
    Sep 15, 2009
    Crawford for me. Clear number 1 in 2 divisions now.
     
  9. IKSAB

    IKSAB Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    4,411
    1,180
    Nov 29, 2014
    Both guys are elite and win their fights in impressive fashion, but based on quality of opposition there's no way you can put GGG ahead of Crawford. Obviously with the amount of diehard 3G fanatics around here this poll was only gonna go one way.
     
  10. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,040
    35,145
    Jun 23, 2005
    Crawford hands down his resume is much better.

    Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk
     
  11. qwertyblahblah

    qwertyblahblah Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,985
    2,063
    Jan 14, 2013
    Tough one. Both are complete, smart boxers, and haven't lost many rounds. I give the slight edge to Crawford, for the better defence and footwork. Crawford's the one guy in my p4p top 10 who I've moved a fair bit the last year, not directly because of his quality of opposition, but because Crawford is patient and conservative and only takes what's available for him, so often fights to the level of his opposition. By now I think I have a good enough read on him that I'll rate him high even if he doesn't always shows his best. If they were the same size I think he could take away GGG's jab and avoid his power, turn it into a boring fight, and outland him. Crawford's won me over, and I'll have him top 5 for a long time.

    I'll take this as a chance to flex my p4p:

    1. Lomachenko
    2. Gonzalez
    3. Ward
    4. Inoue
    5. Crawford
    6. Rigo
    7. Mikey Garcia
    8. Golovkin
    9. Kovalev
    10. Estrada
     
  12. cslb

    cslb Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,626
    9,840
    Jan 27, 2014
    Good list!
     
  13. punisher

    punisher Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,534
    19
    Jul 16, 2010
    Crawford is more tested in the P4P sense. If he is able to go up and clean out 147 (not likely)...it won't be close, IMO.

    Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
     
  14. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,315
    7,890
    Sep 2, 2011
    Crawford with hte Postol win overtook GGG in my eyes.
     
  15. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    38,315
    7,890
    Sep 2, 2011
    I think Crawford may actually be better h2h as well, like I see Crawford being harder to beat than GGG. IDK though perhaps I'm overhyping him now.