Who ranks higher P4P - Crawford or Golovkin?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Jul 24, 2016.


  1. winning

    winning Guest

    WTF? Have you seen Golovkin's power?
     
  2. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    This.
     
  3. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    No, Gamboa was landing because Crawford wanted to fight toe to toe. He could've used the Postol game plan and not get hit...
     
  4. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    Golovkin is very talented and skilled. You can't discredit him like that. And this list looks suspect, they're all black.
     
  5. winning

    winning Guest

    So Crawford struggles to go toe to toe with little men? Sounds pretty one dimensional to me.
     
  6. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    He's the tougher fighter, that's why he obliterates people. You're going to rate him higher because he's stronger?
     
  7. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    So his power is the reason he rates higher than Crawford?
     
  8. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    You think he's one dimensional? Ffs dude log off
     
  9. winning

    winning Guest

    One of the reasons. I mean being strong, eating shots and punching hard is a massive part of boxing.
     
  10. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,267
    1,737
    Jan 4, 2007
    Golovkins ranks higher than Crawford. No doubt about it. The latter is too green and might be overrated.
     
  11. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    Winning however you see fit. It's ignorant to rate someone higher just because they're stronger overall. Both Crawford and Golovkin are highly skilled at what they do respectively. I get it, you like guys with power. But there's more to it than that.
     
  12. winning

    winning Guest

    It's not just because of Golovkin's power. His chin is exceptional. His power is incredible. His footwork and ring cutting is great. He knows what he's doing and he hits so damn hard. It's hard to believe how much damage he can cause.
     
  13. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    You're wet, aren't you? Again, you're focusing on Golovkin's STRENGTH more than his SKILL. Golovkin is a great fighter, imo. But I got Crawford ahead, p4p, because of the Postol win.

    By YOUR criteria, it's impossible to rate Crawford above Golovkin. That's why your criteria is flawed.
     
  14. winning

    winning Guest

    WTF? What's wrong with focusing on Golovkin's chin and power? You do know that when he hits people it devastates them. What happens is that they cannot continue the fight because the power puts their lives at risk.
     
  15. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    There's nothing wrong with focusing on his strength, but that's all your focusing on and basing your criteria off of that. What about guys with less power? Can they not be rated higher because they're not as strong?