Who ranks higher P4P - Crawford or Golovkin?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rumsfeld, Jul 24, 2016.


  1. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Lol.

    Ward
    Rigodeaux
    Crawford
    Kovalev
    Stevenson
    Thurman
    Garcia

    ALL have better resumes...and that's just a few names off the top of my head...
     
  2. winning

    winning Guest

    Martin Murray is basically impossible to stop. Golovkin did it though. And no Crawford could not stay at 135 and maintain his health. He's probably screwed his organs for life with that dip**** stunt he pulled cutting to 135 pounds. It's amazing he's alive at this point.
     
  3. winning

    winning Guest

    A lot of people think H2H Golovkin is the best fighter on the planet.
     
  4. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    A lot of people don't know **** about boxing...
     
  5. winning

    winning Guest

    Well there is a reason Golovkin is rated so highly. People think he's this H2H God.
     
  6. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    The poll is basically "who are you a bigger fan of?"
     
  7. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Knocking over TOMATO CANs gets a lot of traction these days.

    Lol..
     
  8. mirkofilipovic

    mirkofilipovic ESB Management Full Member

    28,390
    39,782
    Jan 7, 2014
    Give me evidence that Martin Murray would get knocked out by Hagler or Monzon, I am sure you have some magical machinery that can predict hypothetical outcomes right?
     
  9. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005

    Truer words have never been spoken, the majority of folks on here live vicariously through these Gladiators its natural for fans to lean towards guys that fit a comfortable profile for them. Sticking with the facts and level of competition Gamboa and Postal are stiffer tests than any of GGG's wins, I've seen different dimensions of Bud and he seems to have more layers of apperception. Then again GGG hasn't had to show his complete repertoire because he hasn't faced an upper crust.
     
  10. alexthegreatmc

    alexthegreatmc Sound logic and reason. You're welcome! Full Member

    39,120
    1,801
    Sep 10, 2013
    Exactly. I had Golovkin ahead until Crawford beat Postol. That and the fact that Crawford is a 2 weight champion.
     
  11. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,041
    35,132
    Jun 23, 2005
    What does being tough have to be with being good? Martin Murray has never won a major title let that sink in.

    If Crawford was able to make 135 easily he would look like the second coming there to if he fought his whole career there.
     
  12. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,041
    35,132
    Jun 23, 2005
    People who have a very narrow minded view of the sport do. H2H size is no factor Loma or Rigo beat everyone in boxing today.
     
  13. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    LMAO.

    Isn't Murray the same guy who dropped a SD to ole' ass Arthur Abraham?

    Come on son, you gotta do better than that...
     
  14. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    I'm assuming this same machine would tell us if GGG beats any top guy from 154 -168lbs we don't know yet but we do know Crawford just beat a top guy. When fashioning a p4p list formula I would think its logical to place a heavier weight on who a fighter has fought and beaten and not so much on who you think he can beat based on the level of dominance he's portrayed vs slightly above average and average competition.