Both are undisputed but Usyk cleared out a much stronger division. Both are equally as skilled (both have their flaws and weaknesses). Usyk does seem to have the better resume. What do you guys say?
Usyk by far for me Joshua Gassiev Briedis Bellew Glowacki Hunter Huck Mchunu Chisora Not comparable imo
Crawford got more knockouts than Usyk got fights. Don't act like Usyk been cleaning up on some high caliber fighters because he hasn't. I think Crawford because if I had to step in the ring at any weight with a choice of skillsets between Usyk and Crawford, it would most definitely be Crawfords.
This is delusional. In 19 fights, he has made himself undisputed cruiser and unified heavy. HIs record is godly. If you prefer Crawford, good for you. But don't try to get there by degrading Usyk. It is silly.
Usyk cleared out a very good CW division fighting in his opponents backyard. Then in three fights captured all but one of the HW belts by beating the british adonis in front of 60k in England. Crawfords best win is Porter. Usyk by a country mile for me.
That cruiser weight division may have been very good to you but not to me. I didn't see any A caliber fighters on that list. The two heavyweights he beat to get to that mouse Joshua were truly dismal. Every body know and Ruiz showed that Joshua was an easy out. Anytime it takes only 19 fights to go from 0 starting at cruiser to heavy weight champion, there is not much resistance in that mix. I am not saying that he don't have skills, what I am saying is that Crawford has better skills.
I call it like I see it and I don't care who it is. If he can get there in 19 fights then it just goes to show that talent was weak as hell.
Yep, it's only US media bias that downplays Usyk. Nothing against Crawford, he's a terrific fighter and got some real **** in him.