Who ranks highest all time Hopkins, Mayweather, Pacquiao or Usyk ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by The Phenom, Dec 31, 2024.


Who ranks highest among these four?

This poll will close on Dec 31, 2025 at 6:21 AM.
  1. Bernard Hopkins

    4.8%
  2. Floyd Mayweather

    30.4%
  3. Manny Pacquiao

    42.3%
  4. Oleksandr Usyk

    22.6%
  1. AdamT

    AdamT Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,178
    8,852
    Sep 18, 2019
    I agree, but I think 3 and 4 is debatable
    I also think 1 and 2 is also debatable, but they are clear of 3 and 4

    Hopkins gets overlooked.
    One of the greatest in MW history
    loads of title defences
    Oldest champ in history
    Still fighting killers at 50
    Schooling guys like Pavlik and Tarver as an old man

    I know many of his earlier great wins were against lighter guys coming up, but I think hopkins is underrated. He may even challenge Floyd and Manny when I think about all his deep accomplishments and at his age
     
  2. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    78,028
    126,597
    Jul 21, 2009
    Whilst I get your point and I generally agree, he was already past his prime when he won his first world title at HW, and was 37 when he became undisputed in a weight class full of these giants who can punch holes in castle walls.

    And he's already the 8th oldest HW champion of all time, the 2nd oldest undisputed one, and in seven months he leapfrogs up to being the 5th oldest HW champion of all time and the oldest ever undisputed one so he can't add much more depth and if he were to lose at this age or older, just one loss. these exact same clowns will absolutely crucify him for it on a molten cross and claim his legacy has taken a massive hit and hold it up as evidence that he was never that good or could ever beat any of the greats of previous generations, especially the North American ones. That's how high they set the bar for him whilst simultaneously believing he's inferior :lol:

    Notice how my points regarding Usyk not cherrypicking, ducking, trying to weaken or cripple his opponents at the negotiating table, being an extremely clean fighter who wins his fights via the use of purse skills, and not refusing to do drug testing with certain agencies

    And not being a PED cheat like so many of these other multiple weight 'greats' who jacked themselves full of PEDs to help them bridge the gap to become multiple weight champs, or being involved in a suspected PED use scandal etc. all gets completely ignored?

    Why would any fair-minded person ignore all that and just sweep it under the carpet? That stuff matters and it matters big. He has accomplished everything he has the hard and noble way on a playing field that was stacked against him or at worst neutral. He ran the race on foot from start to finish, no jumping in a car or on a bike for part of the race.
     
  3. AdamT

    AdamT Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,178
    8,852
    Sep 18, 2019
    Best post in this thread, nailed it for me
     
    Rexrapper 1 likes this.
  4. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    78,028
    126,597
    Jul 21, 2009
    Usyk has fought more savage punchers and legit bangers than any other current champ, a whole bunch much or way bigger than him, but he has never been really hurt by a head shot, let alone wobbled and badly hurt and very nearly dropped, dropped or knocked out

    And he throws a lot more punches at CW and HW than Floyd did at 147 which obviously leaves him more open to being hit

    A CW/HW throwing a lot or way more shots than a welterweight.

    Now even though this is incredibly rare throughout boxing history what we do here is we try to find any excuse we can to try and rationalize why that is and to prove his vast inferiority :lol:

    Could we attribute that to him having an Iron chin? Amazing defence? A mix of both?

    Nah, he has a fairly decent chin and decent defence and he's just been incredibly lucky. That's what it is. Definitely. For sure. No question about it :deal:
     
  5. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,556
    9,825
    Mar 7, 2012
    He didn’t clearly beat Hopkins.

    BS. I respect all fighters of any level. But my criticism of Joe is absolutely justified.

    The guy spent the majority of his career more than happy to fight non world level opponents. I was there. I saw it all unfold.

    He doesn’t get a pass for being undefeated.

    He’s simply not in this conversation, because his resume is terribly weak for a fighter who fought for 15 years.

    He fought less than a dozen world level fighters in his entire career. And that’s the truth.

    Who else have I disparaged?

    Tell me.

    Also, feel free to refute what I’ve said regarding Joe.

    Regarding Ward and Roy etc, they didn’t need to travel. Everything was set up at home. They fought on huge networks, where almost all of their competition were either American, or American based.
     
    AdamT and Dynamicpuncher like this.
  6. OddR

    OddR Active Member Full Member

    1,033
    984
    Jan 8, 2025
    I would like to see a bigger breakdown on Uysk Amateur record but yes it's a insane record. Like for instance the record of those he was beating or how many won gold's etc. I pretty much agree with what you wrote here though.

    It's seems to be a Eastern European thing when it comes to hundred + amateur fights I noticed.
     
    Serge likes this.
  7. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    78,028
    126,597
    Jul 21, 2009
    I might have done a breakdown on that before, as in some of the fighters he beat in the amateurs and their accomplishments. I've definitely listed a whole bunch of big punchers he fought in the ams/WSB and of course pros if not.

    Quite a few turned pro, and even now two of the guys he beat or is 2-1 against at worst are reigning world champions at very advanced ages at LHW and CW. Beterbiev being the most obvious one who like Usyk is undisputed, and the other being Badou Jack. But the vast majority didn't.

    There's a lot of talent which could've translated to the pros, especially from that part of the world and Cuba, and I mean even fighters who didn't medal at major tournaments, but they just stayed in the amateurs or gave the sport up in order to find regular jobs. I've been a big fan of amateur boxing for a long time (albeit not as much now as I used to be). Hence why I've been a fan of Usyk's long before he turned pro

    Yeah, it's much more common with fighters from the former Soviet Union and Cuba who obviously had deep ties with the Soviet Union too
     
    OddR likes this.
  8. ruffryders

    ruffryders Active Member Full Member

    1,111
    798
    Oct 7, 2010
    He does get credit from me for being a true honourable warrior. In the thread about him fighting wlad I commented how it would not befit him. He has been a “champion”, not just a title holder.

    the fact he turned pro fairly late and isn’t the most active, he has only been involved in big fights for many years all help his standing but at the same time don’t fill it out (the necessity of which can be up for debate)

    I don’t see much negative to say about him, he is the only person who can claim to be better than Holyfield at cw. I just feel we need to see more at hw, more defences and then his career at hw has more substance.
    No doubt he has done plenty, but I want to see more.
     
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2025
    Serge, AdamT and Dynamicpuncher like this.
  9. ruffryders

    ruffryders Active Member Full Member

    1,111
    798
    Oct 7, 2010
    Calzaghe???


    Wtf, Does not belong In this convo, not with these names.
     
    AdamT and Dynamicpuncher like this.
  10. The Phenom

    The Phenom Pretty Handsome Full Member

    4,220
    319
    Aug 30, 2008
    Especially when his most significant was a relatively sloppy performance against Hopkins and the fight really could’ve gone either way.
    Calzaghe Doesn’t cut the mustard.Mayweather and Pacquiao have at least 20 notable wins when you look at their careers from late 98 onwards.Calzaghe has exactly 10.Calzaghe was on of britains greats but not one of the greatest boxers of all time.
     
    Loudon, AdamT and Dynamicpuncher like this.
  11. jmarlow

    jmarlow Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,719
    117
    May 7, 2011
    1. Pacquiao
    2. Usyk
    3. Floyd
    4. Hopkins
     
  12. LenHarvey

    LenHarvey Active Member Full Member

    587
    947
    Oct 8, 2024
    Why not? He is the best SMW of all time. Screw Roid Jones & SNAC groper Ward. Calzaghe is #1. He was the dominant champion of that division without copious amounts of HGH & wrestling. I'm bored.. Im gunna play devils advocate now .. you think he can't be mentioned along with Usyk? What's Usyks best win at HW? Fury, who retired years ago, blew up to 30 stone, sniffed copious amounts of coke then & came back & made his name off of the possibly the worst HW champion (Wilder) in history. He then got humiliated by an MMA fighter. What's so great? He belongs as much in a circus as he does in a boxing ring. Looks like a pregnant sow not a boxer too.. best win at CW? Breidis isn't it.. is he better than Kessler? I don't think so. They are about the same level. In fact I'd argue Kessler has the better resume. Because Breidis' best win is probably Glowacki who went on to lose to Laurence Okolie ffs.. Now that's just me looking at both sides of the coin here.. overall I think Usyk is a greater fighter yes, because of his durability, consistency, body of work & in the time frame he did it mainly.. but dont dismiss Calzaghe like he's some non entity.. his performances against Kessler, Eubank, Lacy etc are outstanding ... he was an exceptional talent who admittedly could have been managed better & like a GGG wasn't fortunate enough to have a litany of great names to compete against.. I also think he was a high risk low reward fighter, quick skilled European southpaw.. was difficult to get him matched with the big names.. Bhop for example.. Calzaghe could compete with Usyk if they were both CWs.. i have no doubt about that. Usyk isn't infallible.. you can easily deep dive his resume like anyone else. I dont think resume wise you can compare him to the little fellas though cos naturally they have way more competition depth to choose from because they have a larger selection of divisions to forge your name in. It's unfair.
     
  13. ruffryders

    ruffryders Active Member Full Member

    1,111
    798
    Oct 7, 2010
    Sorry but after reading most of your post, Ive decided I would prefer not to have a conversation with you.
     
    Loudon likes this.
  14. Serge

    Serge Ginger Dracula Staff Member

    78,028
    126,597
    Jul 21, 2009
    I get that and part of me does too

    But if these people want to see more and demand he needs to achieve more in order to be ranked alongside other greats then they need to stop conveniently ignoring the fact he didn't turn pro until way way later them and stop pretending that certain fighters or types of fighters are in their prime in their mid-late 30s which he hasn't been for years and that when they lose at the same age, older or much older than their favs they're still in their primes and a solitary loss is legacy crushing and undoes all their achievements.

    You know at an age or even younger when the fighters they worship from previous eras and consider him vastly inferior to (yes they do and make no mistake about that even if they praise him and pretend to rank him higher than they actually do in order to give the appearance of being fair and objective lol) they deem well past theirs or shot

    And that includes the multiple weight greats who, unlike him, jacked themselves with PEDs (or were embroiled in PED scandals) in order to become multiple weight champs all of which they also conveniently ignore.

    Hell, if Usyk got caught drinking a cup of mild coffee before a fight they would crucify him on a molten cross, let alone with an IV hanging out of his arm and disturbingly low and dead giveaway highly suspicious T/E levels among other red flags, or even worse actually testing positive for PEDs/steroids all of which we're not supposed to mention

    And stop ignoring all the other stuff I said too (him never trying to weaken or cripple opponents at the negotiating table, being an extremely clean fighter, in complete contrast to some of these other greats mentioned here and so many others, especially from across the pond, fighting religiously on a deck stacked against him or heavily stacked against him or on the road which they never did once not on one stacked or heavily stacked in his favour.

    I shouldn't even have to bring any of this up it should all be automatically factored in by them but we sure as hell know they never will and you have to ask yourself why that is. And even worse they know damn well I'm right too

    FTR, I'm not directing any of this at you
     
  15. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    15,829
    14,572
    Jun 9, 2007