Who really ducking who?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Silent_Assassin, May 10, 2010.


  1. Silent_Assassin

    Silent_Assassin Lightning Full Member

    1,229
    0
    Dec 28, 2009
    Ok everybody says that Floyd ducked pac because he ask for OSDT so he can clean up the sport of boxing...but now pac says he is trying to do the same thing and clean up the sport...either way you look at it IMO only one person wasnt tryna make this fight happen....but who do you think it was???
     
  2. Brimstone

    Brimstone Guest

    This content is protected
     
  3. Bee KeepZ

    Bee KeepZ Roid City Full Member

    3,466
    1
    Nov 13, 2009
    Easy fight.

    This content is protected
     
  4. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,273
    5,896
    Oct 5, 2009
    Its both their faults Floyd wants tests and wont budge Manny wont take tests wont budge. They are both to blame. Personally I think he should just take the tests.
     
  5. tonyteb

    tonyteb Active Member Full Member

    544
    0
    Nov 21, 2009
    well if floyd thinks hes so great steroids shouldnt make no differance when he fights another small guy
     
  6. maryann

    maryann Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,061
    0
    Oct 19, 2008
    for me its a matter of who's the lesser evil.

    it started after the hatton fight. roach scored 2 points in that fight against floyd sr as hatton was totally flattened out by pac in just 4 rounds: 1. he was the trainer 2. pac did it faster and more spectacular than his son did and pac started to skyrocket his popularity overshadowing his son's.

    there started the team floyd's annoyance and envy to team pac. crackhead sr. insinuated after hatton's fight that pac is on something as an excuse to his failure. before the cotto fight floyd also accused of using something. much more after pac dismantle cotto. crackhead sr even said right after the fight that he wouldn't advise his son to fight pac coz pac is juicing.

    here comes the flod-pac negotioation. team floyd asked for OSDT. for team pac that's absurd as there was previous accusation for team floyd of using illegal substance. we'll u can't blame pac that he didn't agreed on it. that demand is loaded.

    for some reason you would wonder why wouldn't pac accept it to clean his name. firstly, it was beyond what was mandatory by the commision that supervises the fight. secondly, pac doesn't need to prove that he's clean! accusation to him was without basis and not single evidence was presented and he hasn't tested positive any of his many fights in nevada. just mere words from envious person. burden of proof is on the accuser and when you had an evidence then you had a case of which pac now has to prove the contrary.

    pac in some way became egoistic. he could have promptly disprove his critics by just accepting that demand. but let's not forget that the actual battle (specially in a megafight) starts on the negotiation! both party want to have an edge!

    now the main question is why would team floyd demand such? coz they truly believe that pac is on someting? or they just want to get an upperhand on the negotiation? or they were really concerned of pac? we'll we wouldnt know!
     
  7. PeteDawg

    PeteDawg Observant Observer Full Member

    2,918
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    I think I see Oscar in the audience going "What the f#$k, Shane, you're not supposed to knock him out!!!!" :rofl:silly:thumbsup
     
  8. blastmaster122

    blastmaster122 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,803
    0
    Sep 10, 2009
    They're pulling a Wlad-Vitali :tong
     
  9. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Pac refused to throw a fight with Void. Void has to have a guaranteed win before he will sign a fight. Pac would have never stopped punching when Void was hurt.
     
  10. caneman

    caneman 100% AllNatural Xylocaine Full Member

    16,472
    1
    Aug 5, 2009
    According to this magazine owned by Floyd's reps....

    This content is protected


    This content is protected
    This content is protected



    This content is protected


    :deal

    "A Quack In The Facade". Article by Jim Bagg. All image use is for reference only. Full article can be found on Ring Magazine April 2010 edition page 124.
     
  11. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    seen it and its one writers perspective among many actually:deal BUT AGAIN..EITHER WAY U LOOK AT IT..NOW THAT PAC WANTS TO "CLEAN UP THE SPORT" TOO IT IS WHAT IT IS..SAY WHAT U WANT...BUT THE TS PRETTY MUCH PUT IT BEST:good