I had Pac winning, he landed more and more importantly, he landed more of the clean effective punches. Just as JMM was landing the clean and effective punches in the 3rd fight, Pac was doing it here. 7-5 Pac because Pac let those last rounds slip away from him.
this is no laughing matter, the judges should be shot. i had £400 on manny. just watched it again and still can't believe it. what can be done? it happens to often
As the saying goes " What goes around, comes around " Marquez was blatantly robbed in his 3rd fight with Pac, and now he has been robbed. Anyway its his own fault, according to all his silly little ******* fans he was going to beat the crap out of Bradley, and close the show when he felt like it.
I said the last few rounds Bradley did more than Marquez. Marquez played it safe and just waited for Pac to throw in the last 2-3 rds. Bradley went out and took the fight and controlled.it with the jab the second half. Bradley won 2, 7 and the last 4 rounds no doubt. Maybe 1 of the last 4 rounds were close. Pacquiao won his early and mid rounds BIG but he hardly landed anything those last 4. Round 1 was also close but Pac clutched it so 7-5 either way is understandable. I call it a draw.
atsch Rounds 2, 7, and 9 were all Pacquiao rounds. 10 ,11 and 12 you could give to Bradley. 2-7 and 9 were all Pacquiao. Pacquiao gave away the 10th. Rounds 1, 8, 11, and 12 could have gone either way. In total Bradley couldn't have won more then 5 rounds, and that's if you were being generous.
No offense buddy, but Pac won round 2.. :good I still need to see the fight again to make a good argument why Pac won.. :smoke
Pac won round 2.. :smoke Bradley sweeping rounds 9-12 is ridiculous buddy.. Let's be real here.. :good