Everyone is saying B but the reality is, when they're watching it live, most of them would choose A. I'm an honest person and I say B by the way.
I think you are totally right. I suspect if the poll reflected "real life" it would be around 60%-40% in favour of A unfortunately.
I didn't answer the question so far because I thought it was presumptuous. Why would anyone want their favourite fighter to be awarded an unmerited decision? If your favourite fighter is a man of character and high morale, he would protest and might even suffer morally for a long time as a result of this decision, with long-term negative consequences. In this case, he would have to be a strong man not to let the guilt get the better of him. Why would I want my favourite fighter to be tested like that? Surely, better for him to lose, not just for the benefit of the sport and of fairness in general, but for his own emotional benefit.
B, of course, unless it's Oscar de la Hoya. All of the bad decisions that overrated scumbag has recieved has not been paid back just yet.
:nono He is an overrated scumbag and a very poor actor (Hopkins fight), but two (or more) wrongs don't make a right.