Who should be rated higher P4P? Broner or Froch??

The Matthysse vs Lamont fight wasent done at the time?

Abril also would have been ready by June 22 for sure

 

Froch easily. I would take:

- Bute
- Abraham
- Dirrell
- Taylor
- Pascal

Over anything of Broner of his last few fights.

- Rees
- Demarco
- Escobedo
- Perez
- Rodriquez

The guy just has a weak resume. Should be nonwhere in the p4p list.

 

Neither guy should be.

Broner doesn't have enough big wins. Froch has been outboxed and shown to be a crude B level fighter.

 

Broner who?

 

Froch! Broner should not yet be top ten p4p. Froch is # 9 on my list.

 

Carl Froch 30-2 (22 KO)
Carl Froch SD12 Andre Dirrell

The two statements above are facts, however if you're going to stick to the 3 losses, Broner lost to Ponce 'deal with it'.

On a side note, I rate Froch only slightly above Broner, neither of them are in the top bracket, lingering around 6-20 depending on your agenda, if Broner beats Paulie I would put him above Froch, purely on the basis 3 weight classes against one.

 

Froch, as of now.

but tell me when Froch moves up 2 divisions to cruiserweight to fight the weakest title holder.

 

Cobra hands down. He'll jump further after beating Kessler down too, trust

 

:deal froch fights the best and doesnt duck no one. i like broner but i wanted to see him fight at 140 but its clear hes not going to

 

Matthyssee and Lamont was being negotiated during that time. Blame Burns for ducking Broner and messing up the unification at 135. People say Abril but if he fought Abril people would cry about it and say why is he fighting that boring runner. Who's Abril promoted by anyway? Even Fat Dan Rafael said no one was available for him to fight at 140.

 

this is probably the best accessment