This. I'm fine with Thurman, Khan, Garcia, or Brook. I'd pay to see any of these, but not a third fight with PAC.
Enough with this Pac/Bradley 3. The only reason he got a second fight with Pacquiao was because he was given a gift decision in the first fight. Pac beat him even more convincingly in the second fight. He needs to leave Top Rank and sign with Haymon, he'll still have the oppurtunity to fight Brook and be in a boatload of other big fights.
He already comfortably beat Vargas, Chaves will be fighting Brook and he'll likely lose, so there is no point in that rematch. Prov I can see a rematch, but I think the result will be the same. Both Crawford & Bradley said they won't face each other.
Obviously the list is topped by Brook, Thurman, Porter, Khan, etc. The problem, same as has been for years now, is the network and promoter war. I would be fine with his mandatory Sadam Ali, who I find to be a worthy scalp for any top ten WW. I expect that to be the next opponent for him.
I like watching Bradley against most guys to be honest, always enjoyed him. Pretty much agree with the general motion here: Brook, Khan, Thurman or even Ali. Wouldn't be against a Provo rematch but would rather a new fight. No point in another one with Pac either, he lost the other two convincingly
It should be Sadam Ali. Kid's been waiting for a long time. Ali on April/May and Thurman/Porter winner on Sep/Oct would be great.