Who should get more credit for beating Morales?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JM22, Apr 25, 2011.


  1. Nay_Sayer

    Nay_Sayer On Rick James Status banned Full Member

    15,707
    503
    May 25, 2009
    Exactly when did that happen?

    Raheem should get more credit seeing as he beat a non-weight drained Morales first.
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Raheem beat Morales in a division where he has never had a win in his entire career, in a fight that was completely meaningless. Pac avenged his only loss since 1999 by knocking out the iron chinned warrior.
     
  3. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,179
    Jun 23, 2005
    Raheem should he did it first.:deal
     
  4. Bladegunner

    Bladegunner Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,424
    4
    Jun 18, 2010
    Only a meaningless fight when he lost.

    Looking back at both the raheem fight and the rematch with pac and morales, pac performance still wasn't better than raheem who totally dominated morales. I had morales around even on the cards before the knockout in the 10th if my memory serves me correctly.
     
  5. Doc

    Doc Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,915
    1
    Nov 14, 2009

    The only reason Morales lost was because of Stamina.. he was fighting very well in the early rounds.

    It most likely was the weight drain, he always was the huge man draining himself to have advantage but the difference was age.. his body couldn't handle that and Morales was punished by doing that to his body for so long.

    A Prime Morales beats that ass. Hell an old one was able to do so with ease.
     
  6. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    No difference. It's not like Morales was undefeated when raheem beat him. Or had never suffered a beating, even in a win.
     
  7. GTSK

    GTSK Guest

    Let's not forget Morales was weight drained against Raheem.
     
  8. garfios

    garfios Dark Lord Full Member

    7,460
    18
    Feb 13, 2010
    A good answer for the *******s, LOL
     
  9. GTSK

    GTSK Guest

    How is there no difference? Morales was weight drained against raheem and Pacquiao actually beat morales in their first fight. Pacquiao was robbed so raheem actually fought Mannys left overs.
     
  10. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    How was Morales weight draiend vs. Reheem when he moved UP in weight? He went up to 135 for that fight. Then back DOWN for Pac.

    What do you mean ACTUALLY beat MOrales. Yeah, we all know that. So did Raheem.

    And Morales wasn't undefeated, so all Pac did was beat someone else's leftovers then, if that's the way you think.
     
  11. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    When you say stuff like this, it just makes other question anything else you say. Just completely incorrect.
     
  12. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    GTSK is a ***** posing as a *******. stop getting sucked into his bull****.
     
  13. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    He's an idiot whatever he is. But that explains why he pussed out. Thanks!
     
  14. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Actually Barerra did....
     
  15. Ring Master

    Ring Master The Originator Full Member

    12,223
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    I didn't expect Morales to beat Pac the first time. I thought Pac would beat him like he beat MAB, just too much volume and too much power. I did expect Morales to beat Raheem. So the bigger win for me was Raheem b/c it was the more unexpected and bigger upset. By the time Pac beat Morales the first time(in their 2nd fight) it was a fore gone conclusion.