Who the #@*^$ has Pacquiao ever beat?.. (NOTE: Dates from 11-06-'07 !)

of course you are not. you went out there with all the excuses in the book. lol at MAB's fire at training camp and metal plate excuse. LOL at JMM winning 20 out of 24 rounds.

you can actually nitpick every fighter if you really try. boxrec is a good source.

 

yeah but it's easy to nitpick with Pac. Reeeeaaaaalllllly easy. Way easier than it should be for someone in the #1 p4p spot.

 

my bad, i'll rephrase it, dude who gives a flying **** if you're not impressed on pacs resume?

 

I do, and apparently you do too since this isn't your first time asking.

*****.

 

i doubt.

bernie4366 possible excuses:
juanma - overated, too green, not been with the elites.
linares - too inactive, beaten a shot larios.
valero - i was wrong and he is a bum. he already has injury in his head.
guzman - a mayweather wannabee. too old and shot.

 

so who is your #1?

 

No. All I'm asking and all ANYONE has been asking is for Pac to fight the young guns. Stop making excuses for why he won't do it.

 

Right now?

hmm.... I would have to give it some thought. There is no clear #1 right now. I think the best fighters p4p today need to have some more high profile fights before they deserve it. Most of the top 10 right now are old dogs waiting to be picked off (Cal, Hopkins, etc). Not a real good time for the top 10 p4p list. Maybe Ivan Calderon, although I'm not real excited about him.

 

Ask yourself a question. If you were Pacquiao, there are tons of young guns who is eager to fight you. But there are also top contenders who are eager to fight you that has bigger reputation, bigger reward(lose or win), and can cement your legacy on a stone.

Why would you waste your few fights to other ones when your legacy maker is in front of you? Isn't that the promoter's job to find the better opposition? Isn't it the fighters job to train, show up and fight in the ring whoever is in front of them?



He forgot to answer mine also

 

should i make a thread asking if who would people prefer pac fighting: old guns like FLOYD, HATTON and JMM or young and prime fighters like VALERO, GUZMAN and LINARES?

 

Manny has enough money, time for him to fight for his legacy and that will be better served by leaving no doubt about his record, and right now there is doubt and plenty of it.

 

stop whining dude, it aint good to you :rasta
just relax we'll get the fight that we want one at a time, pac's not ducking anyone you know that, he's trying to fight the best has to offer ever since, pac as a fighter just doing his job to train and to fight hard, i doubt if you are in pacs shoes you would prefer to fight a no namer than fight a hof-er and at the same time will give u tons of money. come-on get real :-(

 

if you don't want pacquiao, how about JMM, Casamayor stoppage, close SD loss to Pacquiao, 12 round UD over Juarez and 12 SD over then 130 champ MAB?

Calzaghe, UD over Kessler for the division title, SD over still p4p fighter in Bhop, a UD over a very well past his prime Jones?

Calderon has no high profile fights, as was one of your criteria, to warrant a P4P#1 ranking.

 

exactly!:happy

 

he has been doing this for the whole of his career and only you, nallege and a few critics thinks otherwise.