Who the #@*^$ has Pacquiao ever beat?.. (NOTE: Dates from 11-06-'07 !)

and they gave JMM problems:yep

 

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA....that was some funny ass sh*t!

Barrera fought Pacman right after he fought JMM...and JMM didn't brutally get into a war with MAB. Pacman dominated him. Therefore those fights are at worst neutralized.
Then, Solis was undefeated with fights against Orlando and Humberto Soto.
How about Jaca? The only other fighter of note that he beat was Honmo, and he lost to Valero.
Then Pacquiao fought Morales, a fighter who many thought BEAT David Diaz at 135. JMM fought Jandaeng. You're telling me that Jandaeng is a better win than even a 80% Morales. ARE YOU SERIOUS?

To repeat....HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

 

comparing JMM's last 4 wins to Pac's last 4 wins?....

 

Erik Morales...at least he straight beat Pac. No questions asked. He beat Pac more convincingly than your lord and savior JMM.

 

hmm... let's see...

jmm - jandaeng (who?), jaca (who?), barrera, juarez (already lost 2X to barrera)

pac - larios, morales, solis (who? but undefeated) and barrera

so how can jmm's last four wins be more impressive than pac's??!! :huh

 

dude, seriously, stop it with the blue print ****. it makes you look like a fool. do you even know what a blueprint is? a blue print is supposed to work each and everytime. did pac lose all his matches after jmm because jmm presented a blueprint? no! add to that. the gameplan morales emplyed against pac wasn't the same with jmm. jmm deserves no credit whatsoever for Morales' win over pac.

 

yep. morales was certainly no counter-puncher in that first fight vs. pac. he was using an effective jab to halt pac from darting in and to set up his right hand. pac, on the other hand, made adjustments in the second fight using a strong right hook counter to control erik's jab. pac also went to the body more in those early rounds (1-5) and it paid dividends in the latter rounds.

 

Of course morales used the same strategy as JMM did agaisnt PAC. Against pac, morales used and entirely different style than the one he usually does. ****, if you watched the fight you'd hear lampley mention Morales watched the JMM/Pac fight about 10 times.

 

People seem to forget that its not only who you beat but also how you beat them. There is a difference between edging out a close fight and completly dominating for every round like he did to Barrera, nobody else could do this to Barrera and after that loss Barrera still had a successful career. Not to mention that he beat him again in the rematch proving that it was no fluke. Morales was past his prime no doubt but Pac was the first to knock him out. Marquez fight was a draw but he knocked him down 3 times in the first.

 

the only possible thing that erik learned from the pac-jmm fight is not to engage in an all-out toe to toe brawl w/ pac but to box him. but erik certainly wasn't an out and out counter-puncher in that first pac fight and jmm didn't use an effective jab either in his fight w/ pac.

 

delete

 

This is what they completely missed about Pac's victories..

Has-beens, prime his past, coming off loses, these are excuses actually that they always sprout to discredit someone.

 

oh so jmm also fought soutpaw to confuse pac? nope. that was an el terrible original. morales was not a selective counter puncher. he did counter punch but he had attacks of his own. jmm only threw punches after pac missed while Morales was willing to engage first.

the blueprint excuse if ****ed up for so many reasons. one of them is that it does not give pac the chance to improve which he did. saying that jmm laid out a blueprint to beat pac means that the pac who fought jmm on that night will be the same pac who will fight over and over again which is not the case.

and what the hells are you saying that morales fought an entirely different style that he usually employs? are you kidding? that was a classic morales fight. morales won because he was the better man that night. jmm is no part of it. and if you look at it, morales has something jmm badly wants and that is worldwide recognition through a win over pac.

 

Normally if you are the champion the TOP GUNS wants a peice of you or get your crown! In this case how come PACMAN who is not a champion but every top BOXER from his weight category to the next level up.

Listen to this JMM fans. Pls answer seriously

1.JMM wants to fight him - so he will finally get his biggest pay check
2. Soto
3. Guzman
4. Valera
5. Casamayor - in one interview he said pacman should fight him
coz pacman deserves a real fight.
6. juan diaz


All boxer are JUSTIFIYING that they are or should be PACMAN's next opponent! Of course ALL of them wants to get probably their biggest pay check!

The fighters above should be the one to VOICE OUT and say hey JMM I want to fight you! Too bad! It aint happening!!!!

Now going back to JMM? He owns a belt which seems not to attact anybody. Even promoters are hot as " HOT " in setting up another fight.

Mr Black TOO BAD! Nobody is interested in your idols crown! Well realistically There are probably a few....
For the 130lbs category nobody beats PACMAN in popularity. Too bad for JMM. He is like a king with a crown with NO Kingdom!

 

hem Silvermags, there is no king at 130lbs, the real king, recognized by the Ring and the boxing world, comes out of a fight between the two best fighters at the top, JMM and Pac, one of the reasons it needs to happen.