Who the #@*^$ has Pacquiao ever beat?.. (NOTE: Dates from 11-06-'07 !)

Cant argue with that (check my avater )

All you have to do is look at the 1st fight, the defeats to Pacman were defo more to do with Morales decline than Pac getting better.

Pac/EM I was Morales last stand as an elite fighter & if your not elite then Pac is the no1 fighter in any division to avoid IMO.


I hear that it was Pac`s improvement that enabled him to twice stop Morales, if thats true then why did the `one dimensional` Pac demolish Barrera & the `complete Pac` win a closeish points decision ?

Marquez also did equally well vs both versions of Pacman.

If Morales wasnt on the slide of no return then stylewise I think he is more trouble for Pac than either MAB or JMM as he has the chin to engage Pac at times aswell as outbox him from distance.

Morales is underrated in general I feel but Pac IS a top 5 p4p fighter, to say otherwise is crazy, he is no1 right now IMO.

 

Very true... dont listen to Lampley, he is delusional sometimes.

When did Marquez stop outboxing Pacquiao & start banging with Pacman for entertainment ?

Never.

Morales mixed his long-range boxing, his counter-punching & his brawling together in one fight to beat Pac, completely different to what Marquez did.

Just because Erik watched the Pac/JMM fight doesnt mean he was copying Marquez, fighters like to pick weaknesses in their opponents styles & use their OWN SKILLS to capitalize.

****ing hell, is no other fighter allowed to score a few counter-punches in a fight without Marquez name being brought up ?

Jesus atsch

 

This thread is moronic.

 

why would he fight guzman, baby bull??? are they better than Hatton and PBF?? JMM i would like to see again.

 

The bottom line is he beat them all. Period.

 

Worst analysis ever.

 

You have to watch the fight to know the answer.

 

beating Guzman, Diaz, JMM(clearly) is the key! forget about Hatton and PBF! they mean nothing!

 

No one is perfect. If they flip flopped, it means they have been proven wrong by Pac. Just like you and me, we also commit mistakes.

Those who don't change their minds are fools.

 

Translation, I am a bias poster.

 

How come he needs to beat these fighters rather than Barrera to get your respect?

If you're just going to dismiss his wins (both of them) over Barrera for no apparent reason, then you could easily dismiss these as well.

 

garbage hater thread.

Pac has the best resume since Roy Jones

add Hatton and the ring title at 140 to Pac's resume, and maybe its better than Roy's

 

So what, for the most part, everyone is a bias poster.

 

in hindsight do you now recognize how stupid this thread is?

who are the 5 fighters who, at the time, you thought were better than Pac?