Who think Paul Smith can beat George Groves?

Haha!

This dft fella seems to want to discredit anything I say.

 

Funny how that particularly pathetic response comes out when some posters are challenged…

I’m waiting for “you’re not a true boxing fan” to come soon as well.

I have no problem with someone challenging my knowledge. My record of picks is pretty good, I’m open about my biases and always glad to admit where I get things wrong.

I’m not the most knowledgeable around the sport’s full history, but I can hold my own from the late-70s on. And I certainly understand how to break down a fight on a technical level.

 

Wow, you’re right – forgetting the name of a fringe fighter who lost to another fringe fighter proves your whole argument. Well done.*

Except it doesn’t, it just proves I forgot a name since the two fights happened back to back, and my interest in Smith is minimal because he’s always been ****.

atsch

 

Derek isn't Paul Smithh or anyone else in the Smith family. He is infact a hammer!

 

Whtid. Coyi!

 

What is it with you, you seem to be very anti scouse you nugget first anti bellew now seems like anti smiths.... has your misses been shafted by some scouse meat ??

 

Paul isnt a supermiddleweight. He was fat and fleshy at that weight/ He's still a bit fat at middle is well. could probably do light middle

 

Paul can win this IMO