who thinks Danny Jacobs is on the juice?

You haven't insulted me, and I responded with insults. My bad and I apologize. Sometimes it's difficult to tell trolls from posters who believe what they post. Sincere apologies Lad.

That being said, the 3g v Jacobs bout was sanctioned by the WBA, not the WBC. The WBA has no VADA agreement, as far as I know.

 

thats fair i don't mind mate, and i do tend to provoke strong responses lol

and thats a fair point but when you factor in the wbc belt is still on the line and the wbc don't care about their rules when it comes to an american not having to do doping tests it paints a very damning picture

especially when you factor in aleem,hopkins and now jacobs were aloud skip testing in the space of a few months by the wbc.

all while the wbc stop the povetkin vs wilder fight when povetkin was under the allowed limit for meldonium which was disgraceful. Again an example of helping the american fighter eg american privilege

 

Is the WBC belt on the line? Do we know that for certain though? All i've seen is mention of the WBA. Unless we know for 100% sure the WBC is involved in the title defense, then it's all just speculation. Of course it makes sense that it would be on the line, but this is boxing, and making sense has never been a prerequisite.

 

it is on the line, been reported in every news outlet and on boxrec. the wbc dont care about doping rules when its an american fighter

 

Jacobs isn't ranked by the WBC, doesn't hold a belt either. I haven't seen anything official on the belts on the line. I'll hold off on judgement until confirmation.

 

and if it is confirmed that jacobs is fighting for the wbc titles without any vada drug testing what will your opinion be?

 

I haven't seen anything under the WBC rule showing that there has to be VADA for a title fight. What I've found is, testing for the champ (3G) and for the top 15 contenders (Which Jacobs is not listed as).

If you have a link, I'd love to have a read.

 

Now, that's what you call an intelligent spanking. I could just say that somebody is getting their ass verbally beat to the curb but I will refrain. lol

 

kell brook wasnt ranked by the wbc or a champion but he had to enroll in vada.

explain why jacobs didn't have to?

 

now thats an intelligent spanking

 

Brook volunteered. He didn't "have to" do anything, but wanted to, so he signed up for the VADA testing program.

 

how do you know he volunteered? and if it is true why can't jacobs volunteer instead of looking like a dirty drug user?

 

also crawford did the same thing, whats that dirty cheat jacobs got to hide?

 

Kell volunteered because he believes in it. You can google it. Simple as that. Now, does that mean Danny Jacobs, or anyone else MUST signup with VADA? No, but it would be nice.

So...you've been going on about how it's some type of American privilege, when in fact:

*WBA isn't doing the same form of testing as the WBC (For now, as that looks to be changing)
*WBC doesn't have Jacobs ranked in their top 15 (So he's then void of any requirement set by the WBC)
*WBC doesn't say their title fights MUST have VADA testing (As far as I found)
*K2 isn't making any gripes about a so-called lack of testing for Jacobs. If there were some concner, I do believe we'd hear
*Kell Brook volunteered for he VADA testing program and was NOT FORCED to his testing against 3G when they fought

 

Did the same thing? What do you mean did the same thing? Versus whom was there no drug testing at all?