Who Thinks The Version Of Pbf At 140 That Beat Gatti Would Still Have Beaten Hatton?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by planetzion, Dec 11, 2007.


  1. planetzion

    planetzion Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,997
    0
    Jul 28, 2004
    Well with this bull**** about Floyds weight advantage lets put it to a poll...
     
  2. Kostya Zoo

    Kostya Zoo Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,803
    0
    Feb 6, 2006
    everybody. where's the poll?
     
  3. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    I created a poll pitting 135 lb. Floyd vs. 140 lb. Ricky, and Floyd is winning by a landslide. So I can pretty much guess what's going to happen in this poll.
     
  4. planetzion

    planetzion Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,997
    0
    Jul 28, 2004
    should be there now :D
     
  5. john b

    john b EVERTON 0- OLdham 1 Full Member

    6,354
    0
    Jul 6, 2007
    Mayweather may have won but it would not be has one sided as the fight at WW, because i am not making excuses here hatton is 140 fighter is frame just can't take 147.
     
  6. Toopretty

    Toopretty Custom made Full Member

    22,883
    1
    Jul 3, 2007
    :lol:
     
  7. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007
    isnt he bigger than 147 anyway?
     
  8. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005
    140 Floyd would have smoked Hatton.
     
  9. djrock247

    djrock247 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,762
    0
    Nov 12, 2004
    These types of questions crack me up. All we KNOW is that 147 lb. Floyd beat 145 lb. Hatton. We can SURMISE all we want, but A.) who knows and B.) who gives a ****.

    Anyway, 108 lb. Floyd TKO's 273 lb. Hatton in round 10.
     
  10. compukiller

    compukiller Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,428
    6
    Mar 4, 2006
    PBF would actually have knocked Hatton out earlier at 140.
     
  11. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,118
    2,754
    Jul 20, 2004
    At 140 it would've been way worse for Hatton.
     
  12. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    At 140, Hatton would be in for an even worse beating
     
  13. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    :lol: Beat me to it
     
  14. nezy37

    nezy37 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,241
    0
    Jul 13, 2007
    You could say Hatton is better at 140 but so is Floyd.
     
  15. Alo2006

    Alo2006 R.I.P Sean Taylor Full Member

    10,021
    1,414
    Jun 28, 2006
    Floyd at 140 equals more speed and power. So that means Hatton goes down quicker :yep