Who thought Pac vs Marquez 3 was a close fight?

Marquez won his rounds clearer. He dominated round 5 :deal

 

yeaah i think he won them clearer but apart from round 5 i don't feel that there was any dominated rounds :good

(reply to my pm) :bbb

 

aight I'm trying to workout and reply to stuff at the same time

 

impossible :bart

 

atsch Jerking off to pics of Floyd and Fitty while on a message board is hardly working out Pedo.

 

wouldn't say really close like the poll says...close sure but clear for JMM

 

Close sure but it was a clear win for Marquez and it wasnt nearly close enough to argue a draw either unlike their 1st fight were you could make a case for that decision.

 

Lance, would you have complained if JMM got the win?

 

Of course not. I'm a huge JMM fan.

 

:yep I got a minute break in between rounds

naw they're pictures of your sister

 

I guess these debates just shows how subjective scoring rounds can be. Pac jumps around a lot, and he flails his arm and throwing armpunches. But I hade him outlanding (Note: not outworking) JMM in several, if not most, of the rounds. I suspect thats what judges goes for first hand, because the number of punches landing is the most objectiva criteria you can find. If you are to label if every punch is "clean and effective" or not it is a whole different ballgame. You can point at some of Marquez punches and say "they are more effective" but does this mean that Pacs punches should be written off as ineffective?

Perhaps it is easier for a fan to put emphasis on that criteria compared to a professional judge, because they dont risk anything if they are accused for beeing subjective?

 

I felt the fight was not close when I did not score it, then had the scorecard 115-113 Marquez...

 

I felt Pacq was trying to do more with more effort while JMM was doing more with less effort. You have a point but sadly many judges are very biased and can have scorecards done the night before the fight if you know what I mean. Call me bitter but I just feel that JMM is always on the bad end of a decision with him and Pacq though I feel he never should have been(have him winning all 3 fights).

 

I accidently chose no but ment to hit yes, I scored it 115-113 for jmm giving pac all the close rounds. I also agree with the op a lot of people say jmm didn't do enuff to win bit pac was also fighting real conservative. This was a chess match the smarter player was going to wn and it was jmm. I still think it was a robbery tho.