holyfield.bradley is the more relevant fighter doing it now.trinadad and cotto give you the pr nut*******.
Hopkins by far....his elbows and headbutts are so subtle they usually go unnoticed during his fight....true old school fighter in every sense of the term.
OMG that has got to be the best bit of dirty boxing i've ever seen. To double foul so affectively and without making it obvious is truly ATG. Also the way he turns away like nothing happened is priceless. Dirty FUG. lol
But yes, ill go for Holy as ATG. To wind Tyson up to the point he was taking chunks out of his ears was the pinnacle. It is all about using it affectively and getting away with it, so ill make Holy no1. Hops is number 2 for overall dirtyness and Bradley 3rd. Ward can definately get into the top 3 but this all depends on his next fight against Froch!
We will just have to wait and see in what manner Andre Ward and his trainer Virgil Hunter "is going to do what they got to do". Those two are genuinly insane, and if I where Froch I would be nervous as hell.
Isnt the Hopkins HB patented and copyrighted to him which is why he never gets points deducted. He cashes royalty checks from Tim and Ortiz was forced to pay.
I think Bradley gets a bad wrap. It's more his style that causes butts IMO and not that he's clever enough like Holy or Hopkins to cause "accidental" head butts. He has an unpredictable in and out style where he lunges in and lets his hands go. And when you have two guys lunging in like that, it's bound to happen.
The big question here guys is who was dirty or dirtier first, Holy or Bhop? Was Holy bad in the Cruisers or was it mainly a HW thing to compensate for his weight disadvantage? Or was it Bhop, who had to compensate for his age and general slowing? Or were both dirty from day one?