Who wants to see harrison v burns now?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by moog, Jun 28, 2014.


  1. Stevie 79

    Stevie 79 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,290
    1
    Feb 11, 2014
    I get what your saying here moog ive noticed a massive difference , i fear its more phsycological from the jawbreak imo tho
     
  2. moog

    moog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,855
    6,097
    Mar 12, 2012
    Agree. If you are a hard arse guy by nature you shrug that of and get stuck back in, if your more soft natured, and reserved its going to have an effect mentally on you. I don't know Ricky, but he seems the latter. Problem now, what have recent physical beatings took out of him? As over last 4 fights he has properly won no more than 10 rounds in total, and took heavy beatings.
     
  3. billy nelson

    billy nelson the fighting scots gym Full Member

    15,873
    674
    Jan 9, 2009
    So your saying Ricky not tough unbelievable lol
    If Scott was a hard case your words not mine why didn't he beat Walsh? Who in all honesty would never have fought Scott in his heyday
     
  4. moog

    moog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,855
    6,097
    Mar 12, 2012
    Ricky is clearly not mentally tough. Scott I still think beat Walsh. I agree he wouldn't have fought him at his prime, as he was the best fighter in Britain at the time and world champion of most competitive division in the world of the last 20-30 years
     
  5. big_daddy

    big_daddy Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,517
    25
    Nov 28, 2013
    He held a belt that had credibility issues at the time, was hardly as if he had a green belt
     
  6. moog

    moog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,855
    6,097
    Mar 12, 2012
    Credibility issues, why did JMM spend several years chasing that belt then? How did most of the top fighters in the division go down the WBO route instead of other belts if it had creditability issues. What don't have creditability is your laughable claims. Scott won title of the excellent Julio Pablo Chacon, the previous champ before him was Prince Naz, and the Champ after Scott was Marquez. So were is he credibility issues with that? Or are they not world class fighters?
     
  7. billy nelson

    billy nelson the fighting scots gym Full Member

    15,873
    674
    Jan 9, 2009
    the champ before chacon was koko kovats from Hungary. Chacon stopped him in Hungary , do your homework
     
  8. Stevie 79

    Stevie 79 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,290
    1
    Feb 11, 2014

    Moog what are u smoking mate , scott was blocking jabs with his face in that walsh fight it was so one sided it wasnt even funny , in scotts prime walsh wouldnt of even got in the same building let alone the ring, For me it also showed that scott hasnt carried the power up to LW that he had at SFW
     
  9. scotchpieirnbru

    scotchpieirnbru Active Member Full Member

    1,316
    1
    Jul 15, 2007
    To say that burns is mentally weak is naive, don't let his mild nature be mistaken for a sign of weakness, you sim
     
  10. scotchpieirnbru

    scotchpieirnbru Active Member Full Member

    1,316
    1
    Jul 15, 2007
    You simply don't win a world title being mentally weak.

    Also, Walsh v Harrison wasn't even close to being one sided lets get real, there is an argument that Scott did enough early on to have an arguement for something in that fight. Walsh did come on strong toward the end though and almost certainly won the fight by a clear round.
     
  11. Macky

    Macky Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,486
    0
    Feb 10, 2011
    You think Harrison beat Walsh.

    Need we say any more? You are clueless and deluded