Who was better @ 175 lbs Michael Spinks or Chad Dawson?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Williams27, May 10, 2009.


Page 1 of 3
  1. Williams27

    Williams27 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,582
    3
    Nov 18, 2008
    Prime Spinks vs current Dawson, who wins and who's the better LHW?
     
    Williams27, May 10, 2009
    Williams27, May 10, 2009
    #1
  2. OBCboxer

    OBCboxer Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,949
    226
    Jun 2, 2007
    Spinks...no question.
     
    OBCboxer, May 10, 2009
    OBCboxer, May 10, 2009
    #2
  3. renyo

    renyo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,417
    332
    Jul 21, 2007
    Cmon now
     
    renyo, May 10, 2009
    renyo, May 10, 2009
    #3
  4. JonesHagler

    JonesHagler Active Member Full Member

    766
    0
    Feb 7, 2009
    wtf kind of **** is this Spinks would take a **** on Dawson
     
    JonesHagler, May 10, 2009
    JonesHagler, May 10, 2009
    #4
  5. Williams27

    Williams27 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,582
    3
    Nov 18, 2008
    I say Spinks UD 12 (8-3-1). I wasnt sure how the responses would be I just thought there would be some people that would pick Dawson. I can see Chad having some good moments though, but Spinks would be too fast and active, and I dont think Chad would be able to catch him with anything that could hurt him. Spinks had a granite chin at 175 pounds, Tysons the only guy that ever really hurt Spinks besides Holmes a couple of times in their fights.
     
    Williams27, May 10, 2009
    Williams27, May 10, 2009
    #5
  6. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    Michael Spinks
     
    Hatesrats, May 10, 2009
    Hatesrats, May 10, 2009
    #6
  7. colin7878

    colin7878 Active Member Full Member

    784
    0
    Jun 6, 2008
    Spinks Jinx puts bad chad on his ass :bbb
     
    colin7878, May 10, 2009
    colin7878, May 10, 2009
    #7
  8. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Is this a question because you don't know? I mean, Spinks is ONE OF THE BEST LtHW's ever, how is this even a question? :huh
     
    Lance_Uppercut, May 10, 2009
    Lance_Uppercut, May 10, 2009
    #8
  9. pngo

    pngo #1Contender Full Member

    7,543
    1
    Apr 24, 2007
    Comon now, Spinks easily.
     
    pngo, May 10, 2009
    pngo, May 10, 2009
    #9
  10. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    This is akin to asking "Who's the Greater CW, Holyfield or Haye?"
     
    Lance_Uppercut, May 10, 2009
    Lance_Uppercut, May 10, 2009
    #10
  11. Borincano

    Borincano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,261
    7
    Mar 1, 2008
    Wow, of course Spinks.
     
    Borincano, May 10, 2009
    Borincano, May 10, 2009
    #11
  12. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    Is this a joke? Spinks was one of the greatest LHWs who ever boxed. He would put Dawson into the hospital. And I say that as a Dawson fan .
     
    ocelot, May 10, 2009
    ocelot, May 10, 2009
    #12
  13. yesihavearm2

    yesihavearm2 ESB Chinchecker Full Member

    9,890
    5,155
    May 30, 2008
    Spinks by brutal KO.


    I cant believe this fight is even being considered
     
    yesihavearm2, May 10, 2009
    yesihavearm2, May 10, 2009
    #13
  14. Sister Sledge

    Sister Sledge Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,129
    27
    Jul 24, 2004
    Why don't you just start a thread that say's "I don't know much about boxing". This is a really stupid question.
     
    Sister Sledge, May 10, 2009
    Sister Sledge, May 10, 2009
    #14
  15. Williams27

    Williams27 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,582
    3
    Nov 18, 2008
    Hey I'm not saying Dawson has a chance to win I just wanted to see if anyone out there could give any good arguement for Dawsons case but I guess not. I agree with all of you that Spinks would dominate.
     
    Williams27, May 10, 2009
    Williams27, May 10, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 3