Who was better, Clinton Woods or Carl Froch?

Who was better Muhammed Ali or Rocking Robin Deakin?

 

I love Clinton but it's not even close really.

 

People on this forum do literally think of Froch as an "ATG" and probably secretly think he was better than Ali.

 

Woods is criminally underrated and I actually think it would of been a close fight. Froch would probably win but he's not levels above like most people would think.

 

Woods was a good fighter and bigger. This would be a great fight.

 

Well Woods was bigger, so would have been quiet close but Froch would have won. P4P Froch in a different league all together to Woods

 

Froch is to Benn what Holyfield was to Tyson

:hey

 

Behave yourself guys Woods best win is over Glen Johnson and we all know he didnt deserve to get the nod.

Every time he went in with a elite world class fighter he lost handily

 

Woods was good but did not really believe in himself. Froch by a fair distance imo. If they boxed Wooods would have been stopped even though he was a light heavy.

 

Both were fighters who had good chins and didnt have the fastest of hands etc.
I would say overall Froch due to having more marquee wins and no losses as bad as say Woods against Tarver, but I think level wise they were more similar than many others would probably think. Consider that Woods struggled with a fresher G Johnson who was a LHW, where Froch struggled with a faded G Johnson boiled down to SMW.
Overall Froch