Who Was Better: Pacquiao or Marquez?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by salsanchezfan, Feb 18, 2024.


Who was better overall?

  1. Pacquiao

    29 vote(s)
    85.3%
  2. Marquez

    5 vote(s)
    14.7%
  1. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,726
    11,233
    Aug 22, 2004
    We all know of their own rivalry. Finally getting around to absorbing all the fights now myself. On the surface of it, one might think it's a silly question. Pac was far more the crossover star, he was much more dynamic, had perhaps more high-profile wins. But does that necessarily mean he was the better overall fighter?

    Both had great careers and a huge collection of worthy scalps. So the question begs deeper pondering; who was actually the better overall?

    Thoughts?
     
    KO KIDD and robert ungurean like this.
  2. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,130
    15,092
    Jun 9, 2007
    On a technical level I take Marquez
     
    salsanchezfan, KO KIDD and cslb like this.
  3. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,165
    5,726
    Oct 5, 2009
    I think Marquez is the better boxer, I also think Marquez won 3 of the 4 fights

    That said Pacquiao did better vs common opponents and I don't think Marquez can run through Oscar, Hatton, Margarito, mosley and clottey in the same way

    That said Marquez did have a better run at 135

    In case anyone wants to debate the common opponents Pacquiao did better versus Mayweather, Barrera, and Bradley
     
    salsanchezfan likes this.
  4. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,165
    5,726
    Oct 5, 2009
    Though I do think Pacquiao was a perfect storm of unorthodox, explosiveness, power, speed, and endurance
     
    salsanchezfan likes this.
  5. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,909
    18,864
    Oct 4, 2016
    Well, once Marquez began using pharmaceuticals too he became Manny's superior ending their rivalry with a flattening.
     
    salsanchezfan likes this.
  6. ChrisJS

    ChrisJS Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,235
    7,117
    Sep 11, 2018
    Marquez a better boxer and fighter but Pacquaio “greater” had the better overall career. But I do believe Marquez won all their fights and I’d trust his best over Manny’s best if we have to transport one of them on a Time Machine to face the best of another era, say within the 126-135 range.
     
    salsanchezfan likes this.
  7. Scotty Cork

    Scotty Cork Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,260
    3,426
    Jul 12, 2023
  8. themostoverrated

    themostoverrated Active Member Full Member

    555
    647
    Feb 9, 2022
    Cut the crap. Manny Pacquaio was the better boxer, fighter and star. And he had a better career and a better resume. He was better at everything.

    However, a question can be asked: who was better in their rivalry? I am typing 'Manny' even as my fingers are revolting.
     
    young griffo and salsanchezfan like this.
  9. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    55,802
    10,180
    Jul 28, 2009
    I don't really think Manny ever bested Marquez but the decisions were close enough for me to bite my tongue about how the wins are used in his greatness discussion. JMM is one of my favourite fighters, and I even made a case that he was in it for their third match and was laughed off at the time. Despite my being actually serious. But it seems unquestionable that Manny was better, due to the rest of their careers. Barrera, Bradley, Mayweather, not just on accomplishment but H2H with other boxers. If you only look at their own match-up, it's missing the forest for the trees in the same way only looking at Norton/Ali would be, in judging their abilities. Saying that Marquez is a better textbook boxer will be true-obviously. But when you're in a fight, you're not even allowed to hit the other guy with a textbook.
     
  10. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,726
    11,233
    Aug 22, 2004
    Not that I necessarily disagree with your choice, but " no contest" seems bit severe, no?
     
    mcvey likes this.
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,627
    28,904
    Jun 2, 2006
    Manny but ,in the words of John Wayne,"I'd hate to have to live on the difference".
     
    salsanchezfan likes this.
  12. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,726
    11,233
    Aug 22, 2004
    That's kind of an awesome saying. Stealing it.
     
    Boxed Ears and George Crowcroft like this.
  13. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,347
    3,818
    Jan 6, 2024
    JMM is the only one to KO Manny in the 21st century and Marquez was never KO'd but everything else favors Manny. Manny is 14-5 in major fights at 140+ JMM is 1-3 and lost almost every round against Mayweather.

    JMM was a bad matchup for Manny but Manny was a worse matchup for just about everyone else above 135.
     
    Thread Stealer and Greg Price99 like this.
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,522
    27,094
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think that we would have to concede that Pacquiao had the greater resume.

    As for which of them is better head to head, now that it a much longer conversation.
     
  15. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,957
    3,429
    Jun 30, 2005