Who was better Tony Tucker or Mike Weaver?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by HistoryZero26, Jun 18, 2024.


Who was better Tony Tucker or Mike Weaver?

  1. Tony Tucker

    14 vote(s)
    31.8%
  2. Mike Weaver

    30 vote(s)
    68.2%
  1. Totentanz.

    Totentanz. Gator Wrestler Extraordinaire banned Full Member

    1,878
    2,256
    Jun 11, 2024
    I think it's insanely funny how overrated Tucker is when he's a worse Ernie Terrell. The only reasons that he's looked on so fortunately in these sorts of conversations are his good looking record, and his fights against Tyson and Lewis.
    If we're talking about records, Weaver has the better lineup.
    If we're talking about head to head, Weaver is likely to take the win (Unless you've got the judges from the Norris-Tucker bout).
    And even if you just match up each fighter against the other's best opposition, Weaver would come out looking better.
    Don't let the jheri curl fool you.
     
  2. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,657
    11,521
    Mar 23, 2019
    I give that to Weav. He gave a prime time Holmes a fight 2nd only to Norton, knocked him down. Beat undefeated Tate, who at the time was being seriously considered as near Holmes-level. Beat Coetzee, at the time a very vaunted challenger who ended up beating Dokes. He even knocked the crap out of peak Williams, when he himself was past it.

    Tucker just doesn't compare well from those perspectives imo.
     
  3. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,173
    25,416
    Jan 3, 2007
    I always thought that the IBF having Tucker at #1 and Douglas at #2 was a scandal. Neither of those guys should have been within screaming distance of those ratings. I think that fight was set up to manufacture a belt holder who would be easy pickings for Tyson.
     
  4. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,732
    Feb 26, 2009
    I go with Weaver. Shaky chin but good power and more of a willingness to win, which exposed the chin more. Tucker was not willing to risk it all like Weaver.
     
  5. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Mauling Mormon’s Full Member

    19,144
    21,168
    Sep 22, 2021
    Despite his appearance Weavers weak point by admission was his stamina. In the beginning he was an off and on again pro who preferred to paint.
     
  6. ikrasevic

    ikrasevic Who is ready to suffer for Christ (the truth)? Full Member

    7,226
    7,701
    Nov 3, 2021
    In this case, Tucker won me over with his performance against Tyson in 1987.
    Some boxers experience their peak in defeat like Mercer vs. Lewis, or Tucker vs. Tyson.
    That's why I think so-and-so Taker would beat Weaver.
    This content is protected
     
    HistoryZero26 likes this.
  7. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,787
    4,201
    Jan 6, 2024
    In a division where everyone was guessing who the best was Buster beating Tyson and Tucker putting up the best fight and not losing for years makes them look like geniuses. The 2 guys they picked did the best. How is that not a credit in the IBFs favor?

    They pretty much had to pick Tucker because he was USBA champ and the USBA had become the IBF. Buster Douglas choice was questionble but certainly was vindicated. Speaking of questionable choices Tucker v Douglas aged better than John Tate v Coetzee thats for sure. Tucker v Douglas is the most valuable 80s alphabelt belt the early 80s WBA belt Weaver held is the least.
     
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,173
    25,416
    Jan 3, 2007
    .

    Because neither Don king nor Bob Lee had a crystal ball… that’s why.. Douglas beating Tyson THREE years later was completely irrelevant to what was going on in 1987. His only win of note was a decision over a slipping Greg Page who everyone and their brother was beating around that time. Tony Tucker’s record was even more padded than Brian Nielson’s and only went the distance because he was fighting to survive, not win. I could see having those guys ranked on the fringes of the top ten like 7-12. But 1 and 2 respectively ??? Nah. Hell, the reason Spinks dropped the IBF title fight Cooney instead was because they wanted to pay him crap for fighting Tucker which should say something about Tony’s true value as a contender at the time
     
    Anubis, Overhand94, zadfrak and 2 others like this.
  9. Totentanz.

    Totentanz. Gator Wrestler Extraordinaire banned Full Member

    1,878
    2,256
    Jun 11, 2024
    If I was Spinks, the only thing that'd worry me about Tucker is having to go ten shitty rounds and potentially lose a bum decision because my opponent has a jheri curl.
     
    Anubis, mr. magoo and bolo specialist like this.
  10. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,173
    25,416
    Jan 3, 2007
    Boxing is a business and they basically wanted the lineal heavyweight champion to defend his title for free
     
    Totentanz. likes this.
  11. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,657
    11,521
    Mar 23, 2019
    Hmm let's see...Weaver beat the undefeated champion/golden boy for the belt (Tate at the time was seriously being put in the same sentence as Holmes); then beat two at-the-time top contenders Coetzee and Tillis on defense. Who did Tucker beat as vaunted as 1979's Tate? Coetzee in 1980 was probably about the same level of contention as Douglas when Tucker fought him.

    Not just that, but Weaver hurt Holmes one HELL of a lot more than Tucker ever hurt Iron Mike.

    Respect, but I feel you're undervaluing Weaver's strengths.
     
    Anubis, JohnThomas1 and Totentanz. like this.
  12. Totentanz.

    Totentanz. Gator Wrestler Extraordinaire banned Full Member

    1,878
    2,256
    Jun 11, 2024
    The people who don't truly respect the early 80s titlists and contenders are the ones that haven't seen any of their fights, or lack any sort of knowledge of that sort of stuff.
    If we take off the biggest two or three fights from each of their records, I think you get the picture a lot easier. Quality fights and wins should always take precedence unless we're strictly talking one-fight-prime head-to-head matches, and even then, Weaver's still ahead.
     
  13. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,908
    44,724
    Apr 27, 2005
    That's berserk. Tucker didn't even beat a titlist to win the vacant title and on top of that never defended it once.

    Crazy talk.
     
    Anubis, Saad54 and SomeFella like this.
  14. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,787
    4,201
    Jan 6, 2024
    Buster Douglas is a lineal champion. Hes the only one who didn't beat a titlelist to win the belt cause he beat a lineal champ.
     
  15. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,834
    6,603
    Dec 10, 2014
    in 1990. in 1987 Spinks dumped in can. Douglas gassed and gave up.

    Weaver awesome one punch ko over hereofore rising WBA champ

    1980 WBA more valuable
     
    Anubis likes this.