Who was more of the complete package 86' Tyson or 83' Holmes?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Martini643, Mar 22, 2009.


  1. Martini643

    Martini643 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,457
    1
    Aug 31, 2004
    I go with Tyson, he had the potential at that point in his career that he had a legitimate shot of winning against any heavyweight in history.
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    86 tyson struggled against James Tillis.
     
  3. box3r86

    box3r86 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,506
    1
    Feb 8, 2008
    Tyson, but I am bias because I think he is one of the best heavyweights and came with power, fear, menace and aggression which we so miss today.

    Klitschko jab!!!!

    But from what i feel Holmes is rated highly by promoters (King & Warren) but had little competition.
     
  4. jones1

    jones1 Active Member Full Member

    834
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    It's hard to compare because they had opposite styles. Tyson had better defensive skills and punching technique. Although Holmes definately had the better defensive footwork :think I'll go with Tyson on the basis that he had a slightly broader skillset and his punching choice had more variety.
     
  5. Taylor_brogdon

    Taylor_brogdon Active Member Full Member

    1,176
    1
    Apr 9, 2008
    Tyson. No other fighter has been such a physical specimen.
     
  6. sweetscientist

    sweetscientist Yori Boy Die Hard Full Member

    956
    1
    Mar 18, 2009
    it's an interesting question because in 1986 tyson was still just outside his early peak around the time of his run of rapid fire victories up to the knockout win over berbick at the end of the year for the wbc belt. holmes, on the other hand, to my eyes, was starting to stall a little, in terms of his fluidity in the ring, and lose some of his speed in 1983--after all, he was a 10 year pro by then. so the question comes down to, is a tyson who was showing the last traces of greenness better or worse than a holmes who was in the late middle of a long title reign--again the wbc belt--and starting to show the ring-rot that would set up the deceptively predictable upset losss (and the loss in the return fight, despite a heck of an effort by holmes) to spinks in 1985.
     
  7. Williams27

    Williams27 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,582
    3
    Nov 18, 2008
    I say Tysons prime year was 88 not 86. I say Holmes was the complete package.
     
  8. Capitan

    Capitan Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,938
    55
    Jul 28, 2008

    Keep in mind that Holmes had a HELL of a jab and he could do it all night...
    Tyson had trouble with Buster....

    Holmes was not one of my favorite fighters....however, he was a complete fighter and had a respectable chin.

    I think Tyson would have been in trouble....
     
  9. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    I'd take prime Holmes over prime Tyson any day.
     
  10. Martini643

    Martini643 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,457
    1
    Aug 31, 2004

    thats true and its a tough choice, a toss up
     
  11. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    Why 86 and 83 though?

    Tyson's peak was 1988, and Holmes was probably better a couple years before 1983.
     
  12. CLUBBER

    CLUBBER C.R.A.B. BOXING Full Member

    7,372
    555
    Sep 14, 2008
    :good
     
  13. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    20
    Jul 23, 2008
    young tyson beats young holmes

    prime holmes beats prime tyson

    washed up holmes beats washed up tyson

    holmes wins 2-1
     
  14. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,405
    11,429
    Jan 6, 2007
    That sums it up quite well.


    In the head to head sense, your correct observation on prime for prime is the most significant.

    Holmes also leads Tyson in the greatness (accomplishment) department.
     
  15. Jinx

    Jinx Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,839
    0
    Aug 18, 2004
    James "Quick" Tillis would blast 98% of the current heavies out right now...:deal