Who was more talented Roy Jones or James Toney

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by gooners!!, Aug 12, 2009.


  1. dbouziane

    dbouziane ............. Full Member

    11,049
    27
    Nov 4, 2007
    rjj's prime was not then i thought...just my opinion

    edit to note that it may have been but i always remember thinking in fights post-toney that he became even more untouchable...could be wrong...but don't shoot your load across the room over it
     
  2. lolb

    lolb Active Member Full Member

    1,158
    0
    Nov 26, 2008
    I love both fighters - Toney is a better boxer technically, the way he slips the punches and fights on the inside is amazing.

    But in terms of talent you've got to give it to Roy. I can't think of many that can match his natural talent.
     
  3. vorapsak2002

    vorapsak2002 Active Member Full Member

    1,196
    1
    Apr 14, 2009
    roy..., not even close
     
  4. pasky2000

    pasky2000 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,119
    0
    Nov 4, 2007
    This post explains it very clearly ! :good Nuff said from here....
     
  5. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,927
    4,687
    Jul 14, 2009
    It is obvious that you did not even watch the fight. Toney was weight drained, out of shape.

    Anyway, RJ is the more gifted athlet (speed and reflexes etc.)

    Toney has the more subtle boxing skills.
     
  6. joe the great

    joe the great Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,453
    2
    Jul 24, 2004
    I would've loved to have seen a Jones-Toney fight after Toney had won the crusierweight tile and Jones won the heavyweight title. They could've fought at the 190 or 200 pound weight limit (whatever the cruiserweight limit was then) and Toney could've put his cruiserweight title on the line and Jones could've put his heavyweight title on the line. Instead Jones stupidly went down to the lightweight class.
     
  7. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    Roy Jones, and its not really close.