Who was right, Lederman, or Merchant??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by drvooh, Nov 23, 2008.


  1. drvooh

    drvooh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,626
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    Ar one stage, Lederman said this was not the ame Malignaggi he's seen in the past, and Merchant countered by saying it was the same Maligaggi, but he facing another tough oponent>> as if he could only do it to standard fighters.
    I myself noticed Paulie rarely threw the right, so I thought he may have injured his hand again..any thoughts??.........:think:think:think:think:think:think:think
     
  2. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,865
    3,114
    Apr 16, 2005
    Personally, I thought Malignaggi didn't look anywhere NEAR as good as he had against Cotto. He has not shown any signs of decline, so I don't think the case can be made that that's the cause. Either Hatton is WAY superior to Cotto or he simply has the perfect style to neutralize Paulie.

    Either way, impressive victory for Hatton, imo.
     
  3. Kush

    Kush Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,095
    980
    Dec 16, 2007
    Same Paul but he ran into a man that was better than the contenders he fought. HBO let Paul have it yesterday giving his promoters more props than him.
     
  4. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Lederman is out of it, again. More than anything else people need to understand something; Hatton was A HORRIBLE STYLE MATCHUP for Malignaggi. Watch any Malignaggi fight. He does nothing to keep an advancing foe off. He'll keep his right hand tucked to his chest, and limit himself to the jab/bending at the waist, ect. Planted to the ground. Malignaggi is perpetually one handed when an opponent collapses on him. He panics when an opponent collapses on him.
     
  5. Canadianfan

    Canadianfan Active Member Full Member

    731
    0
    Apr 20, 2008
    I tend to think there was something wrong with Paulie, off night at any rate. He didn't do anything, he didn't box, he didn't throw punches, he didn't move very well. I don't really want to take anything away from Hatton though. Paulie seemed off and Hatton was on, I'll leave it at that.
     
  6. The Prophet

    The Prophet Active Member Full Member

    1,352
    0
    Jul 26, 2008
    If Paulie hurt his hand he would've said something. After the 2nd, he was never mentally into the fight. Never seen that from Paulie before. Must've been Hatton who caused it.
     
  7. drvooh

    drvooh Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,626
    0
    Oct 8, 2007
    Good response, that means now I can go and grow the **** up........:D:hi:
     
  8. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    :lol:
     
  9. Redondo5

    Redondo5 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,703
    16
    Nov 11, 2007
    i also thought Paulie must've hurt his hand... that's the only reason i think they would've pulled him out.

    He won't say anything about it straight after the fight....as it wouldn't have look good for him (made him look like a sore loser), the crowd (who paid good money for a supposed 50/50 fight), the promoting companies, the TV people (HBO, Sky) and those viewers at home.... I'm sure in due course we will here how Paulie damaged his hands in the first round
     
  10. irmina

    irmina Member Full Member

    142
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    hatton is quicker and more powerful/explosive than given credit for!!!!!!!
    but hatton is shorter/short reach would still have trouble with mayweather
     
  11. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    I have to agree with Merchant on this one.

    It's difficult to access because styles make fights, but Paulie stepped up in class against Cotto and then against a more established 140 fighter in Hatton. He has been beaten decisively in both fights, which makes it difficult to give him the benefit of the doubt on this one.
     
  12. Fire1

    Fire1 Active Member Full Member

    606
    0
    Oct 4, 2008
    well paulie looked real good in the first and 1/2 the second, then he get hit with a very heavy punch from hatton...

    hatton adjusted and fought a very good fight, the best he has fought since kostya, so paulie couldnt do anything... hatton wore him down and was landing crushing body shots left hooks and straight rights.....
     
  13. lenin

    lenin what the **** you say? Full Member

    2,531
    0
    Jan 20, 2007
  14. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    27
    Feb 14, 2006
    Hatton just fought better and won. Paulie just wanted to jab and hold on for the ride.