Who was the best fighter Sonny Liston beat ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Sonny's jab, Jan 20, 2008.


  1. Sonny's jab

    Sonny's jab Guest

    Well, I dont know what his manager was thinking putting him in with Bob Satterfield at last-minute notice.
    I guess Cleve had bills to pay, but Satterfield was a known party-wrecker, and you put a young prospect in with the guy at short-notice at own your peril, just a dumb move. The result doesn't mean much against Williams' standing as a fine fighter.

    Well, Liston did consideranly worse than Johansson against Machen.
    All this proves is that the top fighters have mixed results against each other, something we should take for granted.
    I'm not arguing that Williams has a better record than Patterson, I'm arguing AGAINST the idea that he wasn't among the best men of the era.

    Well, you say the same about Williams.
    Terrell was obviously no mug, even at this stage. A year later he scraped past Williams and beat Zora Folley.

    Yes, but the only contender who went better than 1-1 or 0-0-1 against him was the all-time great.
    I discount the Satterfield loss as foolishness.

    Well, I'm not arguing for his resume. Nor am I saying he stands out above other contenders of the era. I'm saying he looks good on film, and nothing in his record among that period shows him to be a lesser fighter than any of them - other than Liston.

    Patterson's reign actually has a lot to answer for in how "championship caliber" is defined.
    Some of the guys he was defending against would be dismissed virtually as nobodies if Williams had fought them.

    Having said that, of course Patterson has the better resume and accomplishments. I think Williams looks good against Liston, good enough to beat Patterson, IMO, and perhaps good enough to beat Johansson.
    Just my opinion.
     
  2. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
    Well, Patterson's record wasn't the most impressive either. I suppose Machen and Johansson was his biggest scalps, and against Johansson he had one defeat.
     
  3. Marciano Frazier

    Marciano Frazier Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    56
    Jul 20, 2004
    Yes, not a very significant fight, really.


    And I was more retorting your point that Williams did better than Patterson against Liston than trying to prove anything by a common-opponent result. A better way of expressing a general principle here: Howard King, Albert Westphal, Chuck Wepner and Bert Whitehurst all did much better than Patterson against Liston, as well. The majority of people Liston fought did better than Patterson against him, including ones with losing records.


    Yes, he was clearly an emerging contender, but my point is that this is the only high-level win Williams ever managed, and even that was when the guy wasn't really on top.



    And no contenders went worse than that against him. He never showed himself to be the master of any high-level heavyweight contender in several tries. Other fighters, like Folley and Patterson, bettered numerous high-level heavyweight contenders. If Williams had outstripped either Machen or Terrell, or even managed a win over Satterfield in adverse conditions, then I think there could be at least some argument for considering him the best fighter Liston beat.


    You must be if you're saying he was the best fighter Liston ever beat.

    He does look good on film, but I would say his record- even among that period- shows him to be at least an inferior fighter to Patterson.


    Oh, yes, absolutely. If Williams had been fighting a pro debuter while himself having 35+ fights, even not for the title and against a Gold Medalist, it would've been seen as a bit ridiculous. That said, though he had subpar defenses, Patterson himself was undeniably a championship caliber fighter. When Williams stepped up against high-level contenders, he broke even at best; when Patterson fought top-level contenders, he consistently established himself as the better man against the majority of them. Jackson, Moore, Johansson (barely), Machen, Chuvalo, Bonavena- Patterson bested all of these guys. If Patterson had gone 1-1-1 against Jackson and Moore in his early big fights, he may have never had his two championship reigns and numerous battles with top contenders, either- not because he was just being ducked/unlucky, but because he came up short competitively in the fights which would have established him as a true championship-caliber fighter.

    I think that, while he looks impressive film-wise, he wasn't actually on a Patterson's level in terms of ability. Just my opinion, also.
     
  4. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
    Skillwise definitely Patterson (although Floyd's prime weakness, his average chin- played right into Liston's hands).

    I reckon if Patterson had a stronger chin he'd have given Liston a helluva tough fight stylistically, as it was he had good recuperative powers but there's only so many times you can hit the canvas and rise against Liston before being counted out.
     
  5. Holmes' Jab

    Holmes' Jab Master Jabber Full Member

    5,112
    74
    Nov 20, 2006
    Liston's toughest test was definitely Machen.
     
  6. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Same here. Patterson was the best fighter Liston beat. After Patterson, its either Williams, Machen, or Folley for the 2nd best win on Liston’s resume. I'd lean slightly toward Williams’ over Machen and Folley as Liston's 2nd best win.

    The Big cat was at his best when he and Liston went to war. Williams actually busted Liston up, and had him bleeding after round one in their first fight. Machen and Folley didn’t come close to doing anything like this, which is why I give Williams the nod for the #2 slot, even though one build a good argument that that Machen accomplished more, and lasted the distance vs Liston.