Who was the best in their prime of this trio?

Enzo Maccarinelli.

 

MAB! By EM was pretty bad ass too....Nas was as well but against limited oppostion.

 

it's definitely not hamed. you'll get a hands down vote on that.

hard to pick between the other two though but i'm leaning towards barrera

 

You do realize that the GF is full of idiots who hate Naz, and only ever saw him fight like once or twice....there are going to swamp this thread with their anti-Naz agenda, and try and ridicule the suggestion that Naz was as good as Barerra or Morales - two guys who attract extraordinary levels of nuthuggery.

 

Morales

Barrera

Naz

 

Everytime crybaby barrera got his ass beat, big brother Morales always had to clean up his mess.

 

Naz has his fair share of nut huggers as well. It's just unfortunately for Naz his talent and natrual gifts never hit it's peak. For what ever reason he fell short of his actual potential. I feel it had to do with his over the top lifestyle and cocky attitude that overshadowed his preparation and dedication to his craft. At least with Mayweather he was a true proffessional when it came to preparing and dedicating his time in getting better. But really...comparing Naz to EM or MAB is a whitewash!

 

you can argue Hamed...85-0 84kos as an ametuer....28-1 as a pro...thats HOF material right there...but I voted for Barrera!

 

Excellent post. :happy

 

for me morales is the best in his prime and the most exiting to.. yeah naz was exiciting... but morales is an animal..

 

Barrera lost 4x in his prime. Morales takes it

 

Truest words I ever read

 

Your a dumb ****.

Everytime Barrera got his ass beat, he came back better and defied all the critics, which probably included your disrespectful ass.

Barrera was the best in his prime. He showed more variety in his work, although Morales was every bit as good, you could argue.

Naz does not deserve a shout. He got dominated in his prime, and then retired.