Who was the best in their prime of this trio?

Barrerra
Morales


Hamed

Anyone who votes for Hamed is out of their ****ing minds.

 

how bout em edged pac once and two of barrera's fight against pac are all loses one of it is still in his prime.

imho,

em, mab
naz

 

I have always thought that MAB and Erik were over rated, Hamed is a bit underrated....Really im not sure of which was the best, I would have to go with MAB.

 

wtf is pac got to do with it?

 

:rofl:rofl I think hes talking about common opponents between EM and Marco Antonio Burrito

 

Thanks for the translation into english.

By his logic, Hearns should have beat Hagler as he KO'd Duran in 2 rounds whilst Hagler was taken the distance?

 

mab being the heavy favorite against pac on their 1st encounter made the big difference as to who is the best in their primes, mab being prime that time and was ranked #3p4p, unable to give pac a decent competition, imo that fight can be a gauge as em and barrera fought pac, and even in the slowly fading peak of morales he still manage to get a decent win over pac.

 

whatt?? :rofl, we're talking bout facts and not should haves.

 

morales since he only lost rematches even past his prime

 

Prime Morales would have defeated prime Pacman.

 

1. Morales
2. Barrera








3. Hamed

 

****, beat me to it.

 

Morales had a concrete chin, also Wayne McCullough said Morales hit harder than Naz, better workrate and stamina.

Morales was the better technician than Naz and he fought the better opposition, the first time Hamed stepped up he lost.

I would go the other way and say Morales tko's Hamed in 10

 

Morales