Who was the greater fighter: Hearns or Mayweather jr

From 1997-2015 that was his era and during that period no one is close to him. #48 has been Koed 3 times during that stretch and schooled by PBF. PBF>#48 just like Fighter of the Era>Fighter of the Decade.:deal

 

Based on dominance of his era at no point was Hearns considered the best of his era and I'm a big Hearns fan. I rate him high just lower than PBF. Ring Magazine agrees because they rated PBF higher than Hearns in their top 20 fighters since WW2 issue and this was before the #48 fight.

 

I pick Hearns too :good

No excuses.

 

hearns!

only warriors need apply

 

Great fighters aren't afraid of fighting anyone

 

Yes, and FLoyd didn't even dominate his own era. How can anyone say that he did when he barely fought any legit threats and there was legit threats through his entire career! somehow Floyd "missed' fighting Prime Mosley at LW, Freitas, Kosta Tsyu, Williams, Pac (when he was a wrecking machine) and now GGG.
I will give Floyd credit for fighting and beating a drained Corrales and also Castillo twice, but where in the heck are all the other elite opponents?
Hatton, Guerro, Ortiz, Zab, Berto, shot to **** Mosley, washed up oscar, injured past prime Pac, beat half to death Cotto. Some of these guys are decent fighters, sure, but they were already beaten by other people and/or washed up. That isn't special and it certainly isn't great.

 

Nobody cares Torrecampo and Singsurrat or whatever their names were knocked him out, what he did after that is astonishing, you're just as monotonous as the Pact**** atsch Get a grip with this 48 ****.

 

:rofl :nut :!: atsch Terrible post.

 

There is no such thing as fighter of the era

Making up awards now to try an trump an actual award

 

Hearn's freakish right hand goes over Floyd's shoulder roll defense and takes his head off.

 

Excitement has nothing to do with it. I go with Mayweather now. But I understand picking Hearns too. It's a case of measuring Hearns' better wins and Floyd's never dropping the ball in eighteen years against objectively a fair few comparable to a Barkley.

 

I thought it was great. Otherwise I wouldn't have post it. Who are you to say it's terrible?!? If you didn't like it. Don't read it. Pretty simple..

 

Hearns to me, was a better class of fighter by a small margin.
Hearns was a greater quality of fighter by a mile. Took on real challenges against guys who were serious threats. Floyd lost that aspect when he ducked guys who had any small advantage over him. Floyd never tried proving anything to himself he didn't already know.

 

So, when he fought Corrales who was supposedly the biggest Jr LW Puncher in history and when he took on Castillo The Lineal Champ in his 1st fight at LW. That wasn't challenging himself? ODLH at 154lbs? Canelo A young undefeated Lion. These aren't challenges?