Who Was The Greater Fighter Tony Canzoneri Or Marvin Hagler?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cotto20, Sep 19, 2009.


  1. cotto20

    cotto20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,836
    22
    May 31, 2009
    I think this is a hard one to pick.
     
  2. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    I would probably put Canzoneri inside the top 20, where as Marvin would be just outside of my top 30.
     
  3. cotto20

    cotto20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,836
    22
    May 31, 2009
    Interesting. Reasons????
     
  4. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,628
    713
    May 22, 2007
  5. MrMarvel

    MrMarvel Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,792
    15
    Jan 29, 2009
    Hagler. He completely dominated the middleweight division for the better part of a decade. Canzoneri was great, but he had his ups and downs.
     
  6. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    14
    Jun 2, 2009
    Marvellous Marvin Hagler in my opinion
     
  7. cotto20

    cotto20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,836
    22
    May 31, 2009
    Reasons????
     
  8. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    106
    Jun 30, 2008
    The usual reasons. He has a much better resume and maintained his success through 3 divisions compared to Marvin's 1.
     
  9. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004
    Canzonari was a great fighter in a great era and had many fights against great fighters of his time and always aquitted himself well.....Marvin did the same in his...2 different weight divisions...both were top 5 in there divisions....both were equally great in there divisions
     
  10. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    Canzoneri had success across more weight classes, but I'm not sure if he was necessarily better than Hagler in any one of them. Then again, he did face consistently better opposition than Hagler, so it's hard to judge.
     
  11. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    hagler for me but i do tend to favour fighters that dominate a weight for a long time over fighters that move up weight division's. saying that the era that canzoneri fought in was amazing but as said i would just edge towards hagler
     
  12. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    Hagler displayed far greater skills in his prime while Canzoneri was just your average gutty type. But Hagler had that and more ie; better defense, tools, much sharper, smarter, and that led to his being a dominant fighter. No one would go near Hagler in his prime.

    I also wouldn't make too much of the multiple titles craze as it tends to get overrated. Look at Ray Leonard knocking out the bigger man Lalonde but couldnt deal with a man his own weight at 154.
     
  13. TommyV

    TommyV Loyal Member banned

    32,127
    41
    Nov 2, 2007
    I'd rate Canzoneri higher based on his success across different weight classes, and the fact he took on bigger guys and won, whereas Hagler's success, as great as he was, was made against smaller guys like Duran, Hearns. In terms of capabilities, both are pretty versatile in that they can both box and both can bang a bit aswell, aswell as being tough and durable. Canzoneri around 25-29, Hagler around 32-37.
     
  14. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,628
    713
    May 22, 2007
    Thats pretty much it. :good
     
  15. redrooster

    redrooster Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,635
    332
    Jan 29, 2005
    I think most top fighters could take on bigger guys sucessfully. I pretty much dismiss the whole moving up bit as hype.

    it's about how good you are at your best weight, not about how far you can move up. Look at Duran when he moved up to face off with Moore where he met with success but with Hearns he met with disaster at that same weight.

    Measuring a fighter's worth at higher weights is not the way to go.

    Tony was a short armed infighter. A blood and guts type, a face first protoype for the Lamottas of the world-a good clubfighter but just a clubfighter while Hagler was far more gifted physically and p4p the top choice four straight years-the fisitic equivalent of royalty