I agree but in my opinion Trinidad would always fall slightly below DLH because of the boxing politics... don't get me wrong I like DLH, but it's unfair when both opponents fought almost the same opposition and one is doing the risk taking more often, while the other focuses more if he could beat him then I could beat him... I always give the extra notch to those who take the risk on all comers and perform well... How many olympic winners has Trinidad taken out? how many title defenses did he have at 147? camacho,campas, oba carr, mayorga, vargas fought Trinidad when their career were still with a spark... DLH still should be giving credit for his fights against Mosley... but do to what he has done for boxing people would always have him higher than Trinidad... all I know Trinidad had a lot of respect, always had good ppv ratings, and did all this with not a word of speaking English... that right there shows the type of fighter Trinidad was when everyone tuned in on fight night...
Oh really? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_Magazine%27s_list_of_the_80_Best_Fighters_of_the_Last_80_Years Hmmm Trinidad 51 DLH 75. Not a fan of The Ring are you?
That was the 2002 edition before Tito came out of retirement and was embarrased by Winky:deal Nice try though
That was in the summer of 2002, before DLH's biggest win over Vargas. Not sure how The Ring would have it now. Maybe something like this. 1. Ray Robinson 2. Henry Armstrong 3. Oscar De La Hoya 4. Bernard Hopkins 5. Shane Mosley
Try this one, 3 out of the 5 wins DLH had after 2002 and beyond were Trinidad left overs,, the other two against Stevie Forbes most recently and the other one controversial decision over Felix Sturm... hes 5-3 after 2002, easily could have been 4-3:deal
And Tito is 2-2 with some very convincing losses during that time. DLH still beat Tito in H2H(regardless of what the officials said), has a better resumer and is more accomplished! Tito is the more exciting fighter hands down but DLH is just the better boxer IMO!:deal
pacman84 u r a nuthugger,hater and last but not least a oscarsexual please do not compare that ****** to trinidad ever again ok and like vicente fernandez said one time about juanga "yo no canto como el,yo no corro como el,y no me pongo fishnets como el" but u know what thats only your opinion who cares
Tito beat Oscar, in a close one it was DLH' decision to run, he was out of gas. Tito would have eventually knocked his ass out. DLH fought all those fighters you wrote in your thread and Tito fought them all first and beat them before Oscar, every single last one. Take a look do the research, as such Tito gets more credit for beating everyone of them than Oscar, end of story. Tito unified Titles and always took the toughest challenges. In the annals of boxing history Tito's name will always be ahead of Ocar DelaHoyas always as he was the greater Warrior, fighter and always the more exciting fighter.
what about tito and quartey. they were the other 2 best welters in the world when oscar fought them waht about BHOP. he was by far the best middle
what makes DLH resume better than Trinidads? A lost to Wright, Jones, and Hopkins is no shame, esp. when your fighting at someone elses weight, hall of famers, and coming out of retirement:hey
Presscot... I'm a fan of DLH (hate to admit it) But ****, I enjoy reading your threads.. And I can agree with your arguments.. not bias but stating the facts.. :good
As others have already stated, what's happened between then and now in no way AT ALL vaults DLH damn near 30 spots to get ahead of Tito. DLH has more fights in that time span, with mediocre wins and more losses. Those ratings would either stay the same, or they'd both drop. And considering DLH was only 71 on a list of 80, that means he'd more than likely be off the list.
115-114, 6-5-1. Trinidad W12 DLH. Tito outboxed Oscar and you dick suckling Oscarsexuals have heartburn with that!:yep
You can keep spouting it like a broken record, Jack but everybody saw the fight, and every body knows Tito came up short. Including Tito and JackPresscott .