Who Was The Hardest Puncher Marciano Met?

"I'm content that my thread prompted discussion and possibly some re-evaluation."

I've re-evaluated. I am now more convinced than I was before of Marciano's greatness after the miserably weak showing of the anti-Marciano voices on this thread and other similar threads.

 

Whatever, you are being a complete and utter ***** McGrain. I just don't get what happened to you lately. You just seem to be bitter because The Marciano Nutlickers as you wish to call us, are completely taking McVey's weak arguments apart. And the bitterness and namecalling towards us for doing this is making this place look stupid.

The whole point was not if Robinson and Charles were P4P comparable as punchers. Choklab just brought up a point about style. Both men relying on timing and technique as opposed to raw power, when you asked him to elobrate what he meant by "raw power."

But Morbius brought up a good point. And the actual Charles vs Robinson pure punching debate had some interesting responses here:

[url]http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=297994&page=3[/url]

 

I notice you didn't make any case at all except an appeal to authority, but almost all human progress has been made by folks challenging the voices of entrenched authority.

The best fighter either man ever knocked out in my opinion was Archie Moore, who was knocked out by Charles.

Charles moved into an unlimited division and knocked out much bigger men than Robinson ever knocked out. Deal with it.

"If you disagree, you are wrong. I am right, and that is all."

I haven't seen anyone quote Robert Bellarmine in a while.

 

-It is a shame I had to lower myself to your level. A "*****" for a "nut licker" And yes you were "full of ****" back in that last thread for attacking me for having the audacity to defend myself against McVey's constant hurl of insults and than completely denying it.

-That wasn't even the argument, Choklab wasn't comparing their power and you went off for no reason. Several would question "alot" and it has nothing to do witih Marciano, but you have no interst in that argument.

 

There is nothing shameful about disagreeing with you.

You really should stop a bit and think about the egoism behind that statement.

I never in my life found anybody disagreeing with me about almost anything to be shameful.

 

-You don't seem to know what we are discussing as this has nothing do with Walcott.

-I don't know what Lufcrazy knows. Nor does it matter, I disagree with his "cruiser" crtique and explained myself.

-And I countered and explained how irrelevant and stupid that was in this specific scenario. Rocky was not able to avoid Walcott's punches. Had he used his supposed youth advantage and kept out of range, you might have a point, but that did not happen.

-No.

 

"utter *****" "full of ****"

Sir, I never used those terms with you or anyone else on this board.

It might be wise to make certain you don't confuse posters.

 

He certainly had no problem calling you a "nut licker" unprovoked.

 

Okay.

Fair enough.