Who Was The Hardest Puncher Marciano Met?

Do you think Foster stops the journeymen heavies that Moore did?

That was the question that you did NOT answer. I didn't ignore your post entirely only the part that had nothing to do with the one it was responding to . I didn't see how that part was relevant?

 

Being stopped by heavyweights has absolutely no relevance to a lightheavyweights power. Satterfield was stopped by plenty of heavies could he hit? It' s a ridiculous argument.

Foster power wasnt his problem against top heavies, he wasn't built to take their shots and couldn't put weight on.
Moore often weighed as much or more than the heavyweights he faced.Which heavies did he stop of any note whilst scaling near the lhvy limit? Bivins who at 180lbs was just 4 lbs heavier.

Foster failed against the top heavies because he was conceding too much weight.
Against:
Ali 41.5lbs
Frazier 21lbs
Folley31.25lbs
Terrell 19.5lbs

Jones? Only 9lbs but he was a late substitute for Zora Folley. To stae Moore is a" far superior puncher" to Foster is crass ,agenda driven ignorance.

 

Cyz scaled 211 lbs for Holyfield, the same as Evander, he hadn't been a middleweight for 14 years!
You disqualify yourself from serious discussion and any likelyhood of being taken seriously with these asinine comments!atsch

 

Yeah middleweight Cyz weighed 220lbs for that fight.

I can beat up on you all day and every day sunshine, keep it coming .


You think I'll forget you insinuating I'm a racist?
No ****ing way! Bring it on!

 

Thanks for answering my original question.
What I would say is Moore has better stoppages against better heavyweights.That doesn't automatically translate into him being a bigger puncher imo.And,in this case I don't think it does.

I would say,[ without any way of proving it ,]that Foster had better one punch power.

 

NAME ONE TOP RANKED HEAVY MOORE KO'D ?

ps You do know what a ko is don't you?
Its the referee counting ten over someone.
Just thought I'd mention that.:yep

 

It's veered from the original question which prompted some near hysterical replies.

 

Satterfield kod a 21 years old late substitute Williams.
Satterfield was a top ten heavyweight at the time .[1954].
Willlimas was not rated until 1961 7 years later ,get real Chump!

Satterfield conceding 33.5lbs , took out Baker with a right and left in the first round.
Baker was stopped on his feet by Moore having never been down ,spot the difference?

In two fights Moore couldn't floor Valdes yet Satterfield, conceding32lbs managed it.

Don't compare Moore' s power with Satterfield's, you just make yourself look even more absurd.If that's even possible?