No I am an English Caucasian, but according to Mendoza, and Bummy Davis I am colour prejudiced against white boxers. This in spite of the fact that I am white and my favourite fighter is Jack Dempsey?:huh " Common sense ain't that common":bart
To say McVey thinks he's the most intelligent on these forums he's too dumb to realise each and every fight is different. Some fighters get KTFO by average punchers yet on other occasions walk through bombs by murderous punchers, it's far from black and white!
The reason your argument fails is simple. Agramonte had only 24 fights in that time he met just one puncher, who kod him, he might have been ko'd by every puncher he faced, we will never know. You could say his chin was unproven, except the only hitter he faced ko'd him , which means the evidence points to him not having a great set of chops. I'm not saying Moore was not a dangerous puncher at that stage, I'm saying the evidence you provide to prove it is seriously flawed. How big a puncher was Moore at heavyweight might be a more relevant question? Was he even a bigger puncher than say Bob Foster who never kod a decent heavy? Moore has a long list of ko's, 131 but only about 30 over real heavyweights, and three of them were wrestlers. I don't think he would be on anyone's top ten punchers at heavyweight, maybe not even top 20.
Nobody knocked out Cesar Brion. I think in 60 fights Brion was stopped just once by TKO in the last year of his career and he fought Charles, baker, Layne and mauriello. When Louis fought them Brion and Agramonte were young tough fighters who gave the best contenders a lot of rounds. Nobody is saying Joe Louis was still at his best but the film proves he still hit hard and was far from shot. Louis was beating the guys he needed to beat to justify his high ranking. If other contenders knocked Agramante down I stand corrected but knocking him down on film there was was nothing wrong with Joe Louis's techniques, power and the way he set it up during the sequence leading up to that knock down. Louis was certainly capable of replicating this at that time against anyone else if allowed his own way.
A good example of this might be Bob Stalling, who prior to meeting Earnie Shavers in 74 had been beaten 24 times, and stopped on 6 occasions by guys like Larry Middleton, Willie Moore, Henry Clark, even Jack Bodell ffs. Yet not only did he stand up against Earnie he out pointed him over 10, dropping him in the 9th.
Exactly but bird brain McGay can't get his dumb head around that idea, talking to him is like talking to a brick wall.
He was beating them but he was NOT STOPPING THEM! His reflexes had eroded to a point where he saw the openings for power shots but before he could react they were gone. "In the meantime, Louis met Cesar Brion for a return match on August 8 and won a 10-round decision. Fourteen days later Joe stalked and chased Jimmy Bivins for 10 rounds. Joe cut loose at the finish, but the power wasnt there and Joe settled for a decision win. The inevitable fight now loomed. If Louis was to remain in contention, and silence his critics, he would have to beat a top contender. That contender was Rocky Marciano, a fighter of great promise, but still considered untested. The make or break fight was held on October 26, and we know the result, which sent Louis into retirement for good." Christ Almighty he said so himself many times! Louis said if he had been prime he thought he would have taken Charles out in about 8rds. That was a year before he faced Marciano! Brion wasn't much ,his best win is over a 36years old Mauriello who was having his last fight I repeat Agramonte was never more than a gatekeeper,all the better figthers beat him, and he was conceding 20lbs to old Louis. Watch Brion go toe to toe with Louis without being wobbled,watch Agramonte get up from the canvas and trade with Louis, momentarily having him in trouble and Louis had 20lbs on Agramonte. Listen to the commentator of the Savold fight mentioning how Louis relied solely on his left jab. Louis relied on the jab and the hook by this stage of his career and Savold was his last ko victim. http://fightfilmcollector.blogspot.co.uk/
This is dishonest and rather typical. It doesn't matter if he fought someone "the size of Lennox Lewis" which is an utterly pedantic thing to say. He didn't fight a severe heavyweight puncher. I never said he never fought a fighter capable of severe punching. If I hit that guy for long enough he would end up looking like that. If he had a glass jaw and I hit him once he might look like that. Possibly, if I caught him perfectly and he had a GOOD jaw, he might look like that. I am not a severe heavyweight puncher. I said he never fought a severe heavyweight pucher. And he didn't. You know this and are either a) running interference because you feel admitting otherwise is detrimental to your hero b) you are a troll or c) you are a dummy. You can't blame me if I don't know which one it is. How about, "he never fought a severe puncher Matt, you're right." Not, "well, not one the size of Lennox Lewis" not "well it depends on what you mean by "severe" doesn't it?" not "well look at this picture of a knocked out fighter who got knocked out two more times that year, faster, by non-severe heavyweight punchers", just, "yeah, he never fought a great heavyweight puncher." How about that? Moore never even knocked him down. Guy was stopped on his feet. This is a joke, this "evidence". Moore beat up a guy over ten rounds and then the referee rescued him. Yay. Well done Moore. A solid HW puncher Moore, very decent. Used his boxing skill to pick apart a novice fighter over the first seven then thrashed him for three rounds. Three rounds. If Shavers or Foreman or Langford thrashed him for three rounds he would have been killed that night, the poor guy. This constitutes evidence AGAINST Moore being one of the most deadly HW punchers...none of them need to beat a guy this long. Why do you have to be so persistently dishonest when "defending" Marciano? The guy is a legend, one of the greats. Why pretend he's something he's not? It's just no necessary and it makes people hateful toward him.
Choklab, McVey is the guy who listed Iron Hague as someone who hit as hard as Rocky Marciano! When I asked him which ranked person did Hague stop, he never replies.
-After collapsing and leaving the ring in a stretcher against Moore, Lavorante fought two more times that year, went into a coma and died. You would have to be playing dumb to suggest the Moore fight and bad management didn't drive him into a tragic end. He should have never got back into the ring after the Moore fight, not that soon at least. Ali and Riggins were not in their with the same man Moore beat. -The descriptions suggests Lavorante was draped over the ropes, sagging. He wasn't techncally down but he was out. Then Archie landed a hard left-uppercut to Alejandro's chin that spun him into the Ropes where he sagged. Referee - Tommy Hart jumped in and stopped the bout at {0:38} of the Final Round. -Not a fair analogy. Moore was 45 years old in this fight against a much bigger man with a reputation for being a dangerous puncher. How often was Foreman, Shavers, and Langford in such a situation? It would be like the Foreman of the Schulz fight taking on 1990 Ruddock. Or how about the Stewart fight, where a 43 year old Formean thrashed Stewart in the opening rounds, couldn't finish him, and got his face beat to a pulp. Is this evdience against Foreman?
Thank you. You just said it. Archie Moore was a dangerous hitter at that stage. Why does a puncher with world-class heavyweight knock out power have to be in the top ten biggest hitters if all time to qualify as a severe puncher? We can all name twenty heavyweight contenders or more with world class power who won't go down as making anyones top ten but they had serious power. proberbly Gerrie Coetzee, Razor Ruddock, Mike dejohn, Tim Witherspoon, Mike Weaver, Cleveland Williams (at a push), Mike Dokes, max Schmeling and Frank Bruno might not make anyone's top ten hardest hitters but they all hit plenty hard enough. Moore punched hard enough. Walcott punched hard enough. Charles punched hard enough. Joe Louis was still a danger. Past his best yes but a worth while contender of the level of a Trevor Berbick or Ron Lyle even in that incarnation..
:good This is how I see it. Moore had to be a severe puncher in the heavyweight division. People argue and scream that Ron Lyle was a severe puncher - I don't doubt that he was by the way- but there is more evidence that old man Archie was a dangerous puncher yet still people want to down grade what he was capable of and did achieve in the division.