Who was the more destructive 175 WBO belt holder?

It's better to judge fighters according to their ability.

 

While the Griffin stoppage was quicky, DM was finding him a lot in round 4, and definitely would have stopped him later. That last right hand DM smashed him with sent Griffin crashing into the ropes, which most definitely held him up.

 

Clearly "1.5 million> $750,000" is the real End of the Story. Your personal claims of Hill running in fear of Moorer are just that. Nobody is turning down double money, especially if they had been struggling their whole career to get a proper payday.

And you are going to have to find sources that state Hearns was regarded as the easier opponent, Hill was the favorite and Hearns was considered to be on the decline but that doesn't mean he was regarded as "easier" than Moorer. But its not like it matters when one guy was worth twice as much.

And not surprisingly you have nothing to say about Moorer and Steward refusing the fight initially because of money as well, and going on to fight chumps for a year. In truth this is probably your first time hearing about it.

So you are calling me a roach now? Sorry, you got completely schooled on events you arrogantly claimed you lived through. That must be embarressing.

 

None of these "facts" add up to your fantasy of Hill running like a roach from Moorer. Why not address the other crucial facts I listed that actually explain why the fight didn't happen? As opposed to indulging in these hand picked fragments that allow you to maintain your facade. What is the point of being so stubbornly ignorant? While you've done nothing but speculate, I've dug the entire story up, the pretense is over, there's nothing to speculate on.

Your refusal to just admit you were mistaken about the Hill/Moorer situation and retreating to fantasy land is pretty damn embarressing.

 

WRONG! You are wrong about everything. You have never been right about anything and Saturday night proved this.

Now pack your **** and leave, you complete and utter racist idiot.

 

I have no double standards, you however have been shown to have no idea what you are talking about as you now have been forced to agree Hill/Moorer was about money and not "Hill running like a roach. "

Your are going to have to breakdown in detail with sources why Stevenson/Kov and Moorer/Hill are exactly the same for me to even remotely consider your argument. From where I'm standing they are not the same and this has been explained to you.

 

Seriously, people comparing Light Heavyweight Moorer who was one of the best ever to Kovalev who's biggest win is Cleverly and the poll is actually close?. The trolling is definitely getting out of hand.