Who was the more destructive 175 WBO belt holder?

Good call, DM was another destructive force at the weight

 

We're talking about LHW's, dork. Where do you get HW from in this topic?

EDIT: Nevermind, I know what you're kidding about now. LOL. Yeah, what MM did at HW has nothing to do with this topic, and NaySayer looks dumb because of it.

 

I would argue DM over Moore, since Moorer fought for the WBO when it was in its infancy.

 

:good

 

Good post. People forget how tough Swindell was. Moorer knocked out everyone at 175. That has got to count for something.

 

Now we are getting out of hand.

 

Stay with us ok. Follow along.

 

What the hell...

DM was the lineal Champion with a vastly superior resume at the weight.

 

We are talking about who was more destructive at lhw. Wtf does everyone have a reading comprehension problem???

 

I'm arguing about the topic at hand. Why, what are you arguing? None of you guys answers is in a book. Just give your opinion and keep it moving. Stop trying to write and answer your own questions.

 

More destructive WBO LHW Champion to be exact. And he doubled Moorer's number of defenses and knockouts over a much higher level of competition in Hill, Hall, Griffin..etc..

 

Yeah if you go by there first 22 fights at lhw.

 

Why? Why make this point when Moorer went up in weight after 22 fights. Why?

 

Because its valid.