I'll say Tillis. Took a lot of good shots.. let his hands go.. and the clinching wasn't too bad either. :good
I thought Tillis made a better attempt at winning rather than just surviving.. that's why I chose him.
well..out of the ones i have seen...i'll go for bonecrusher...like a wise old fox against tyson in that fight... i am trying to remember the mitch green fight...i have seen it on tv a couple of times but is not fresh enough in my memory to say how good or bad green was..
yes ... a boring fight...lots of holding...but he showed how a defensive boxer could tie tyson up like that...there was a lesson in that boring fight...
Tillis, though Green and Tucker did pretty admirable jobs hanging around, considering the fact that Mitch, in some ways, didn't even try due to the stuff happening outside of the fight.
You guys are forgetting Ruddock, that was a slugfest. It's either Tillis, Tucker, or Ruddock. Tillis because he came closest on the scorecards but it was with a green and sick Tyson, Tucker because he arguably won 4 rounds against a prime Tyson, and Ruddock because he wobbled him several times in the toughest win of his career. Any of these three will do.
It could be argued that Tyson won every round in that fight, don't see the Smith fight was anything special except showing he was fairly durable and liked to clinch. He only landed one solid punch the entire fight, in the 12th. Blood Green didn't really come close to winning either, I scored it 9-1 I believe the last time I watched it although he gave more of an effort than Smith.