Who were the best fighters Hopkins beat at MIDDLEWEIGHT ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Unforgiven, Jan 1, 2011.


  1. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    It does, i've not contested that. I see people citing it as not even a good win though, which is bull****.
     
  2. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    No, the vast majority of his defences were against fighters who hadn't proved a thing BEFORE they fought him either.
    Really, middleweights who weren't established at all. Glen Johnson and Joe Lipsey have been mentioned, and I really don't know who they beat to be considered top contenders.

    I think the mid-1990s- early 2000s middleweights really suffered from the 168-pound division splitting away the talent, maybe.
     
  3. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Hopkins was as proven against Jones as Johnson was against him.


    Yes, it was a dry time, it´s as bad, if not worse know but there are a few good propects/rising contenders out there. And of course Hopkins absolutly dominated that division.
     
  4. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Yeah, or at least almost.
    But Roy Jones was only an up-and-comer too, at the time.
     
  5. kopejh

    kopejh Guest

    Jones at middleweight was as good as he ever was
     
  6. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Yes, and i'm not the one disregarding the Johnson win, and i'm not the one using the 'proven' theory. Maybe you misread what i posted.
     
  7. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    I just stated the obvious. Neutral. How you value those wins is up to you. But if you rate one win high, than you have to do the same with the other. Same, the other way around. That´s all I´m saying.
     
  8. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    Yeah, i haven't disagreed with that though, i was the one saying this earlier, as i said playing Devil's advocate and trying to point out double standards.
     
  9. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Of whom?
     
  10. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
    To conclude so far: Tito is the best he beat and then, quite a bit below, is Johnson (DLH was at a catch weight, right)? And after that? Can someone try a top 5?
     
  11. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    1. Trinidad
    2. Echols
    3. Joppy
    4. Holmes
    5. Jackson

    Something like that.
     
  12. p.Townend

    p.Townend Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,400
    4
    Jan 14, 2009
    Most people had Trinidad to win at the time,the pre fight reviews I read had him taking it by KO.Its a shame it gets treated as Hopkins beating a smaller fighter because it was a good fight and a good win.
     
  13. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    People were saying that Johnson wasn't proven at MW when Hopkins beat him etc etc, so i said that Hearns had done nothing at mw when Hagler beat him, so you gotta apply the same logic to him if you do so to Hopkins. I was playing devil's advocate.
     
  14. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,075
    54
    Oct 15, 2007
    :good
     
  15. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
    No Johnson?